1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02765557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The function of mate guarding in a field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae;Teleogryllus natalensis otte and cade)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forced copulation is impossible in gryllid crickets as the female mounts the male and both have to cooperate in the transfer of the spermatophore. Male crickets, however, can court females vigorously, often attempting to sequester females down burrows (Simmons, 1992; Bateman, 2000) or mate guarding them attentively (Sakaluk, 1991; Hockham & Vahed, 1997; Bateman & MacFadyen, 1999; Bateman, Gilson & Ferguson, 2001). This could constitute coercion to mate and harassment that result, in costs for the females in terms of mate choice and, ultimately, longevity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forced copulation is impossible in gryllid crickets as the female mounts the male and both have to cooperate in the transfer of the spermatophore. Male crickets, however, can court females vigorously, often attempting to sequester females down burrows (Simmons, 1992; Bateman, 2000) or mate guarding them attentively (Sakaluk, 1991; Hockham & Vahed, 1997; Bateman & MacFadyen, 1999; Bateman, Gilson & Ferguson, 2001). This could constitute coercion to mate and harassment that result, in costs for the females in terms of mate choice and, ultimately, longevity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, it functions as a sperm protection behaviour, in that the mated male keeps rivals away from a female that he has inseminated, and thus reduces the risk of sperm competition. In crickets, where mate guarding is widespread ( Loher & Rence 1978; Simmons 1986; Sakaluk 1991; Hockham & Vahed 1997; Bateman & Toms 1998), there are three main theories as to its function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, aggression could be selected for if it prolongs spermatophore attachment time (Loher and Rence 1978;Evans 1988;Hockham and Vahed 1997;Bateman and MacFadyen 1999;Bateman et al 2001). Several authors have proposed that male behavior during post-copulatory guarding might allow females to assess a male's health and vigor, such that vigilant or vigorous guards, being the most desirable mates, signal their genetic superiority by their ability to harass females (Thornhill and Alcock 1983;Simmons 1986Simmons , 1990Simmons , 1991Hockham and Vahed 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have proposed that male behavior during post-copulatory guarding might allow females to assess a male's health and vigor, such that vigilant or vigorous guards, being the most desirable mates, signal their genetic superiority by their ability to harass females (Thornhill and Alcock 1983;Simmons 1986Simmons , 1990Simmons , 1991Hockham and Vahed 1997). An alternative explanation, however, is that the intensity of mate guarding is the result of sexual conflict (Parker 1979;Chapman et al 2003b;Arnqvist and Rowe 2005), so that males who stand to lose the most by CFC are the most vigorous guards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%