2014
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2014.v21.n6.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fundamental group of the space of contact structures on the $3$-torus

Abstract: Abstract. We show that the fundamental group of the space of contact structures on the 3-torus (based at the standard contact structure) is isomorphic to the integers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bourgeois reproved this using contact homology in [Bou06, Proposition 2]. Then Geiges and Klukas in [GK14] proved the theorem when and .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bourgeois reproved this using contact homology in [Bou06, Proposition 2]. Then Geiges and Klukas in [GK14] proved the theorem when and .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main result is the following theorem, in which V d is endowed with any principal circle bundle structure inherited from one on V = T * 1 S-the case g = 1 = d was previously treated by H. Geiges and M. Klukas in [GK14]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, one can extract information about G(X) through the study of K 0 (X). For instance, this has been exploited in [AM, Bu, Kr, Mc] for the symplectic case and studied in [CP,GK,GG1] in the contact case. The space K 0 (X) can be analyzed through the evaluation map at a point with the use of the space of linear almost complex structures.…”
Section: Homogeneous Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, one can find in the literature several examples of contact manifolds (V, ξ) for which ker (j * | π0 ) is non-trivial; the interested reader can consult [2,5,11,12,[17][18][19] and [6,23] for, respectively the tight and overtwisted 3-dimensional cases, and [2,20,22] and [15] for, respectively, the tight and overtwisted higher-dimensional cases. Notice that the examples in [2,20,22] are tight according to the definition of overtwistedness in higher dimensions in [1], which generalizes the 3-dimensional one given in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%