2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fundamental phonological unit of Japanese word production: An EEG study using the picture-word interference paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other languages, however, speakers may not retrieve phonological information in a phonemic fashion. For example, in Chinese speakers retrieve phonological information in a syllabic fashion (Chen & Chen, 2013;Chen et al, 2002;O'Seaghdha et al, 2010;You et al, 2012), and in Japanese speakers plan phonological information based on moras (Kureta et al, 2006;Verdonschot et al, 2011Verdonschot et al, , 2015Verdonschot et al, , 2019. Therefore, the phoneme, syllable, and mora have been considered as the primary phonological preparation (PP) unit (or proximate unit/functional phonological unit in some literature) in SWP in English, Chinese, and Japanese, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other languages, however, speakers may not retrieve phonological information in a phonemic fashion. For example, in Chinese speakers retrieve phonological information in a syllabic fashion (Chen & Chen, 2013;Chen et al, 2002;O'Seaghdha et al, 2010;You et al, 2012), and in Japanese speakers plan phonological information based on moras (Kureta et al, 2006;Verdonschot et al, 2011Verdonschot et al, , 2015Verdonschot et al, , 2019. Therefore, the phoneme, syllable, and mora have been considered as the primary phonological preparation (PP) unit (or proximate unit/functional phonological unit in some literature) in SWP in English, Chinese, and Japanese, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we do not believe that the present results imply that the phonological unit size in Japanese word production is the phoneme. Previous studies have repeatedly shown that native Japanese speakers do not employ a phonemic phonological unit (e.g., Ida, Nakayama, & Lupker, 2015;Kureta et al, 2006;Verdonschot et al, 2011;Verdonschot, Tokimoto, & Miyaoka, 2019), unless they are highly proficient Japanese-English bilinguals and English words are used as stimuli (Nakayama et al, 2016). In addition, although Kureta et al (2015) also reported a phoneme-based form preparation effect using the associative-cuing task, they were likely correct in suggesting that the effect reflected a strategy employed by their participants, rather than that the Japanese phonological unit is the phoneme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound tones are studied by neurolinguists, such as B.D. Zinszer and P. Chen [9], T. Xia and L. Mo [10], R.G.Verdonschot and Y. Miyaoka [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%