2017
DOI: 10.4169/college.math.j.48.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fundamental Theorem on Symmetric Polynomials: History's First Whiff of Galois Theory

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us now explore the concept of approximation of symmetric functions by symmetric polynomials. For more details, we refer the reader to Davidson and Donsig ( 2009 ), Blum-Smith and Coskey ( 2017 ). In the sequel, we will denote the symmetric group over the set {1, …, n } as S n .…”
Section: Approximating Symmetric Functions With Symmetric Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us now explore the concept of approximation of symmetric functions by symmetric polynomials. For more details, we refer the reader to Davidson and Donsig ( 2009 ), Blum-Smith and Coskey ( 2017 ). In the sequel, we will denote the symmetric group over the set {1, …, n } as S n .…”
Section: Approximating Symmetric Functions With Symmetric Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the invariance of ab under (8) is a special case of the fact that ab = (e iθ a)(e −iθ b) for any θ, and this latter invariance property is behind all the cancellation in Price's key calculation (5). 3 Second, the reason for the utility of shifting n (z) upward by a n + b n -arriving at P n (z), which satisfies a nice recursion-remains a mystery in [21,22]. We view Proposition 1 as the beginning of a resolution: n (z) was something natural minus a n + b n in the first place.…”
Section: Symmetric Polynomials and Cardano's Depressed Cubicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic proof is found in an 1816 paper of Gauss[10, paragraphs 3-5]. For an in-depth discussion of this proof, see[3]. Gauss's paper also appears to contain the first modern statement of the theorem; all prior articulations formulated it as a statement about roots of a polynomial, implicitly assuming the existence of a splitting field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). The underlying set of N 2=4 is {[0],[1],[2],[3]}, and we have[0] ≤ [1] ≤ [2] ≤ [3] ≤ [2]. The uc-semiring N 2=4 is Frobenius, but not upper-bound or symhomomorphic.Is it fully elementary?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%