2021
DOI: 10.14744/iacapaparxiv.2020.20007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The future of evaluation of child and adolescent psychiatric treatments

Abstract: Purpose of review: To imagine the future methods and paradigms for evaluating treatments in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP). A historical perspective will be adopted first to explain the origin of methods and designs presently in use. Then an overview of methodological breakthroughs that occur currently will be presented. Recent findings: At the moment, mechanisms of action and randomized controlled trials are the two pillars of treatment evaluation. However, personalized medicine, digital health, big da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
145
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(161 reference statements)
7
145
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clustering methods, such as k‐means clustering, 46 and neural network, 47 evaluate repeated measure using Euclidean distance or computational models. In this kind of models, similarity is determined by how well the responses fit the same shape of curve, often requiring large data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering methods, such as k‐means clustering, 46 and neural network, 47 evaluate repeated measure using Euclidean distance or computational models. In this kind of models, similarity is determined by how well the responses fit the same shape of curve, often requiring large data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both panels illustrate results based on the theoretical transition data computed in the present work. The left panel also includes results based on the experimental data of Musielok et al (1995) and Bridges & Wiese (2010), while the right panel includes results based on the theoretical data of Tachiev & Froese Fischer (2002), Hibbert et al (1991), andBautista et al (2022). Horizontal lines show the mean abundance inferred from each data set.…”
Section: Validation Via the Solar Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these theoretical results, the MCHF-BP values (Tachiev & Froese Fischer 2002;Froese Fischer & Tachiev 2004) are in overall better agreement with experimental results than the others. More recently, Bautista et al (2022) calculated the gf -values of the two lines at 8683 Å and 8629 Å, which are diagnostics of the solar nitrogen abundance, using a combination of different methods, i.e. AUTOSTRUCTURE based on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-Amaldi central potential, pseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock, and multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MCDHF) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [33] used neural networks, which take advantage of few-shot learning and autoencoder to perform predictive analysis on COVID-19 data. Some studies also focus on finding the conditional dependencies between features, which can be used to analyze the behavior of different features towards the prediction of label [34]. A study for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients and indicating whether patients are more likely to recover from coronavirus or in danger of death is performed in [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%