2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Law and eTechnologies

Abstract: the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When discussing the results of the study, one should compare them with several scientific works of other researchers on similar topics. Kraftova and Kraft [11], Kerikmä e and Rull [12], Slakoper and Tot [13] are focused on the revealed essence of digital and computer technologies and their place in legal activity. They consider the features of digital and computer technology algorithms in the legal field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When discussing the results of the study, one should compare them with several scientific works of other researchers on similar topics. Kraftova and Kraft [11], Kerikmä e and Rull [12], Slakoper and Tot [13] are focused on the revealed essence of digital and computer technologies and their place in legal activity. They consider the features of digital and computer technology algorithms in the legal field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth recognizing that the legal aspect of smart contracts is not sufficiently covered. In connection with the characteristic direction of the parks and resident companies for innovation activity is considered a significant need to bridge the gap between legal semantics smart contract, business semantics and the regulatory semantics of and between semantic translation, performed by a computer and its operating activities, with the assurance and guarantee of the empirical reliability of the information [18,19]. This requires certain efforts to include semantic security mechanisms in the digital environment of technopolises when concluding smart deals by creating an ontological database of smart contracts containing the semantics of such contracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the value is 1, it indicates that the contract does have a vulnerability of that sort. and when the value is 0, it indicates that the contract does not have a vulnerability, a contract is labeled as vulnerable (1) if it secures at least two votes in the analysis of fuzzing tools indicating a vulnerability. otherwise, the labels as non-vulnerable (0).…”
Section: Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the age where blockchain technologies are flourishing, smart contracts have become a fundamental element in decentralized applications, bestowing automation, transparency, and security to a range of transactions and engagements. Smart contracts are contracts that execute themselves, with the conditions embedded directly into the code [1]. These contracts serve as the foundational elements of decentralized applications and are crucial for executing intricate business processes on the blockchain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%