2016
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azw070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future(s) of Security Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there remains the problem that the effect of taking preventive measures serves to prioritize prevention over other values and goals and this may be to securitize criminal justice more generally (Crawford & Hutchinson 2016, Ogg 2015, Zedner 2016. Concern about such trends is further provoked by new security threats, such as the ongoing conflict in Syria and Iraq; the recruitment and, increasingly, the return of foreign terrorist fighters; and, not least, the recurrence of terrorist attacks that provoke great public fear and political apprehension, raise national threat levels, and increase pressure on the Preventive State to do yet more to ensure security, even at the countervailing cost of imperiling rights.…”
Section: Conclusion: Beyond the Preventive State?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there remains the problem that the effect of taking preventive measures serves to prioritize prevention over other values and goals and this may be to securitize criminal justice more generally (Crawford & Hutchinson 2016, Ogg 2015, Zedner 2016. Concern about such trends is further provoked by new security threats, such as the ongoing conflict in Syria and Iraq; the recruitment and, increasingly, the return of foreign terrorist fighters; and, not least, the recurrence of terrorist attacks that provoke great public fear and political apprehension, raise national threat levels, and increase pressure on the Preventive State to do yet more to ensure security, even at the countervailing cost of imperiling rights.…”
Section: Conclusion: Beyond the Preventive State?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now common to look at policing as broader than what the police do (Bowling and Sheptycki, 2015; Crawford and Hutchinson, 2016; Haggerty and Ericson, 2000; Wood and Shearing, 2007) and to understand issues of crime as related to other forms of external threats under the wider umbrella of security. We see technologies as more than simple policing tools; we view the process of technology development as an important process in the development of policing logics emergent in the interactions of scientists, end-user border guards, bordering practices and material agencies.…”
Section: Policing Risk and Security At The Eu Border: Staging Sovereimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on a social science study of an EU-funded technology research project in which scientists and laboratories across Europe engaged with end-user border guards to develop a handheld device to detect CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive) 1 smuggling at EU borders. The article contributes to the growing engagement with borders and risk across the fields of criminology and security studies (Aradau and Van Munster, 2009; Bigo, 2016; Crawford and Hutchinson, 2016; Mythen and Walklate, 2016b). It expands knowledge of the governance of security (Wood and Shearing, 2007) by highlighting the role played by research groups and laboratories in shaping emerging modalities of transnational policing in the context of international terrorism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another salient example is Sampson et al’s theory of ‘collective efficacy’ ( 1997 ) as a means of improving community participation and of informally monitoring disturbing behaviour within a neighbourhood. Nevertheless, criminologists are so immersed in a political and legal discourse about security, with crime and crime control as their focal points, that they often fail to capitalize on wider multidisciplinary scientific knowledge about the volatile meanings of security and security governance ( Crawford and Hutchinson, 2016b ). Why is this so?…”
Section: Thinking About Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%