1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8043(96)00298-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gel generator: a viable alternative source of 99mTc for nuclear medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Table 2 that the chemical yield of 99m Tc was 71-75 % based on the 10 and 15 MeV bremsstrahlung irradiation. The ZrMo gel generator has been established as an alternative user friendly column source to obtain 99m Tc from low specific activity 99 Mo [37][38][39]. The 99m Tc-elution performance of the gel is assessed based on the following important factors: the 99m Tc elution efficiency, the 99 Mo breakthrough in the 99m Tc eluate, the gel synthesis conditions such as the molar ratios of zirconium to molybdenum, the drying conditions i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from Table 2 that the chemical yield of 99m Tc was 71-75 % based on the 10 and 15 MeV bremsstrahlung irradiation. The ZrMo gel generator has been established as an alternative user friendly column source to obtain 99m Tc from low specific activity 99 Mo [37][38][39]. The 99m Tc-elution performance of the gel is assessed based on the following important factors: the 99m Tc elution efficiency, the 99 Mo breakthrough in the 99m Tc eluate, the gel synthesis conditions such as the molar ratios of zirconium to molybdenum, the drying conditions i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-irradiation process is only dissolution of the irradiated solid targets with an alkaline solution, and only a small amount of radioactive waste is generated in the process compared with the (n, f) method. The 99 Mo production cost of this method or the (n, γ) method is only 0.83 US$/37 GBq (Boyd, 1997).…”
Section: Solid Irradiation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Caused by the radioactive waste, the separation process of 99 Mo is too complex, and 99 Mo production with the (n, f) method needs expensive facilities and extreme care to avoid contamination with FPs. The 99 Mo production cost by this method achieves 57 US$/37 GBq (Boyd, 1997), and it is too expensive.…”
Section: Fission Methods ((N F) Method)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some gel and distillation generators have been developed [cf . 8,9] but their overall efficiencies are not comparable to that of the alumina column generator. In view of the situation, combined with the fact that for production purposes irradiations are mostly done at medium-flux reactors, the method of choice for production of 99 Mo for medical use is the fission process.…”
Section: Gamma Emitters For Spectmentioning
confidence: 94%