2004
DOI: 10.1080/08854300408428383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gendered effects of the reregulation of the Swedish welfare state*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Teigen and Wängnerud () note that the recession of the early 1990s struck Sweden much more severely than Norway and thus provided a breeding ground for differences in the gender equality discourse in the two countries, not least because of the consequences the recession in Sweden had for welfare state arrangements, which was a focal point for policy making and public debate (Daune‐Richard & Mahon ; Earles ; Ellingsæter 2000a,b). The conclusion from Teigen and Wängnerud is that, together with the decrease in the representation of women in parliament and the remobilization of the women's movement, this package of conditions constituted what could be called a ‘window of opportunity’ for radical feminist elements in Sweden.…”
Section: Unpacking the Prerequisites For A Parliamentary Political Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Teigen and Wängnerud () note that the recession of the early 1990s struck Sweden much more severely than Norway and thus provided a breeding ground for differences in the gender equality discourse in the two countries, not least because of the consequences the recession in Sweden had for welfare state arrangements, which was a focal point for policy making and public debate (Daune‐Richard & Mahon ; Earles ; Ellingsæter 2000a,b). The conclusion from Teigen and Wängnerud is that, together with the decrease in the representation of women in parliament and the remobilization of the women's movement, this package of conditions constituted what could be called a ‘window of opportunity’ for radical feminist elements in Sweden.…”
Section: Unpacking the Prerequisites For A Parliamentary Political Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different economic situations in Sweden and Norway in the 1990s, where the recession struck Sweden much more severely than Norway, provided a breeding ground for differences in the gender-equality discourse, 16 not the least because of the consequences the recession in Sweden had for welfare state arrangements, which was a focal point for policymaking and public debate (Daune-Richard and Mahon 2001; Earles 2004; Ellingsæter 2000b). With the decrease in the representation of women in parliament and the remobilization of the women's movement, this package of conditions constituted what could be called a “window of opportunity” for radical feminist elements in Sweden.…”
Section: Explanation Of Differencementioning
confidence: 99%