The gene pool of the Belgorod oblast population: Malecot’s isolation-by-distance parameters

In, Sorokina; Balanovska, Elena; Churnosov, Mikhail

doi:10.1134/s1022795409030120

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The genetic consequences of migration have been studied in human populations for decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, the interest in this issue has not weakened because demographic predictions are needed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristics of migration in the population of Yevpatoria (Crimea)

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indicators characterizing population migration were calculated according to the marriage records of Yevpatoria (Crimea) of 1960/1961, 1985, and 1994/1995. The marital migration coefficient m in those years was 0.80, 0.75, and 0.66, the endogamy index was 0.04, 0.08, and 0.15, and the rate of marriage contin gency by birthplace was 0.15, 0.16, and 0.19, respectively. The highest values of the positive mating assortative index were recorded for people from the Caucasus, Central, Central Black Earth Oblast, and Northwest regions of Russia in 1960/1961 and for migrants from Moldavia, the republics of Central Asia and Caucasus, Western Siberia, and Ukraine in 1985. In 1994/1995, natives of Yevpatoria were also included in this group. The average distance of migration by year was 909, 1280, and 1314 km, and the marital distance was 960, 1397, and 1171 km. The "radius" of the Yevpatoria population, in accordance with the Maleco model in the years under study, was 98, 134, and 137 km. The distance isolation indicator b was decreasing and amounted to 0.00049, 0.00043, and 0.00038. In the migration flow in all of the periods, the majority of immigrants came from different regions of Ukraine outside Crimea (27-31%), followed by natives of various places in Crimea (21-24%), Central (3.6-8.5%), and Central Black Earth (1.8-6.1%) regions of Russia, and the South Cau casus (4.0-5.7%). The proportion of Russians and Jews decreased in the migration flow, while the proportion of Ukrainians and representatives of non Slavic nationalities increased.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristics of migration in the population of Yevpatoria (Crimea)

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, the spatial and geo graphical characteristics of marriage migrations indi cate that, when choosing a marriage partner, prefer ence is given to the persons who originate from the same locality For example, this trend was described for Ukrainian villages in the Kharkov oblast [33]. It was shown that approximately 90% of all marriages were contracted between natives of one region (in the late 20th century, approximately 50%) [34,35] and the average marriage distance (the distance between birth places of spouses) did not surpass several tens of kilo meters in the south of Central Russia in the early and middle 20th century [36,37]. It is logical to suppose that the structure of nationality marriages can be affected by the prevalent ethnic environment: in the places where the population proved to be ethnically homogenous (or almost homogenous), small marriage distances will keep this state of affairs in the future.…”

Section: Genetic and Geographical Properties O F The Regionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gene pool similarities and differences between Ukrainians and Russians of Slobozhanshchina based on Y-chromosome data

Utevska

Pshenichnov²,

Dibirova³

et al. 2015

Cytol. Genet.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-R esults from studying Y -ch ro m o so m al p o ly m o rp h ism s o f R ussian an d U k ra in ia n p o p u latio n s are presen ted for S lobozhanshina, w h ich is a co n tem p o rary b o rd er region, in h a b ite d in th e 17th-18th cen tu ries at th e "W ild F ie ld " b o u n d ary due to m igrations o f b o th th e R ussians from th e n o rth an d U k ra in ia n s from th e west. In general, th e U k ra in ia n an d R ussian p o p u latio n s o f S lo b o zh an sh ch in a are very close genetically; th eir set an d frequency range o f Y -ch ro m o so m e haplo g ro u p s are typical for E astern E u ro p e. However, a detailed analysis o f highly inform ative Y -ch ro m o so m e m arkers show ed th a t b o th n atio n s reta in th e e th n ic specificity o f th e ir gene pools after 3.5 centuries o f coexistence in th e sam e historical territory: th e U k ra in ia n p o p u la tio n s are sim ilar to th e rest o f U k rain e, an d R ussian p o p u latio n s gravitate tow ards th e so u th o f E u ro p e an R u s sia. T h e persisten t genetic differences m ay be du e to th e spatial ch aracteristics o f m arriage m ig ratio n an d the p re d o m in a n t eth n ic enviro n m en t.

show abstract

The gene pool of the Belgorod oblast population: Changes in population genetic relationships during the past 50 years

Churnosov

Balanovska

2009

Russ J Genet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The gene pool of the Belgorod oblast population: Malecot’s isolation-by-distance parameters

Cited by 7 publications

References 6 publications

Characteristics of migration in the population of Yevpatoria (Crimea)

Characteristics of migration in the population of Yevpatoria (Crimea)

Gene pool similarities and differences between Ukrainians and Russians of Slobozhanshchina based on Y-chromosome data

The gene pool of the Belgorod oblast population: Changes in population genetic relationships during the past 50 years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About