2015
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Generalized Alchian–allen Theorem: A Slutsky Equation for Relative Demand

Abstract: We generalize the Alchian–Allen theorem so as to account for income and endowment effects and provide two versions of a Generalized Alchian–Allen theorem: one for a unit cost component and one for a proportional cost component. Both versions provide a decomposition of an uncompensated change in the demand ratio of two goods into a substitution effect and an income‐endowment effect—and may thus be regarded as extensions of the familiar Slutsky equation for relative demand. Finally, we apply our results to the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were several recent attempts to generalize the AA theorem on different grounds. Minagawa and Upmann () do so accounting for income and endowment effects and provide two versions of a generalized AA theorem: one for a unit cost component and one for a proportional cost component. Both versions provide a decomposition of an uncompensated change in the demand ratio of two goods into a substitution effect and an income‐endowment effect.…”
Section: Economic Theory Behind the Aa Theorem For Multiple Goodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were several recent attempts to generalize the AA theorem on different grounds. Minagawa and Upmann () do so accounting for income and endowment effects and provide two versions of a generalized AA theorem: one for a unit cost component and one for a proportional cost component. Both versions provide a decomposition of an uncompensated change in the demand ratio of two goods into a substitution effect and an income‐endowment effect.…”
Section: Economic Theory Behind the Aa Theorem For Multiple Goodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both versions provide a decomposition of an uncompensated change in the demand ratio of two goods into a substitution effect and an income‐endowment effect. Therefore, the theorems offered by Minagawa and Upmann () can be regarded as extensions of the Slutsky equation for relative demand.…”
Section: Economic Theory Behind the Aa Theorem For Multiple Goodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This general implication has also practical relevance, for example, for tax policies. Governments often aim at reducing total consumption of demerit goods 2 Further details and development on this topic can be found in, e. g., Minagawa and Upmann (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%