The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity

Abstract

The mixed or heterogeneous multinomial logit (MIXL) model has become popular in a number of fields, especially marketing, health economics, and industrial organization. In most applications of the model, the vector of consumer utility weights on product attributes is assumed to have a multivariate normal (MVN) distribution in the population. Thus, some consumers care more about some attributes than others, and the IIA property of multinomial logit (MNL) is avoided (i.e., segments of consumers will tend to switch among the subset of brands that possess their most valued attributes). The MIXL model is also appealing because it is relatively easy to estimate. Recently, however, some researchers have argued that the MVN is a poor choice for modelling taste heterogeneity. They argue that much of the heterogeneity in attribute weights is accounted for by a pure scale effect (i.e., across consumers, all attribute weights are scaled up or down in tandem). This implies that choice behaviour is simply more random for some consumers than others (i.e., holding attribute coefficients fixed, the scale of their error term is greater). This leads to a “scale heterogeneity” MNL model (S-MNL). Here, we develop a generalized multinomial logit model (G-MNL) that nests S-MNL and MIXL. By estimating the S-MNL, MIXL, and G-MNL models on 10 data sets, we provide evidence on their relative performance. We find that models that account for scale heterogeneity (i.e., G-MNL or S-MNL) are preferred to MIXL by the Bayes and consistent Akaike information criteria in all 10 data sets. Accounting for scale heterogeneity enables one to account for “extreme” consumers who exhibit nearly lexicographic preferences, as well as consumers who exhibit very “random” behaviour (in a sense we formalize below).choice models, mixture models, consumer heterogeneity, choice experiments

Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: An empirical comparison using social care data

“…Thus, future work on comparing these methods may consider using more sophisticated methods that model heterogeneity, such as the mixed logit, or scale-adjusted latent class analyses (Flynn, 2010b). Alternatively, models that jointly model preference and scale heterogeneity could be estimated, such as generalised multinomial logistic models (G-MNL), which nest both of those models as special cases (Fiebig, Keane, Louviere, & Wasi, 2010).…”

We want to sort! Assessing households’ preferences for sorting waste

“…their choices demonstrate the same extent of randomness (Train & Weeks 2005). A method which allows control for both preference and scale heterogeneity of respondents at the same time is the Generalized Multinimial Logit Model (G-MNL) (Fiebig et al 2010). In this model, the utility function takes the form:…”

GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services

“…We estimate equation (4), where the WTP coefficients are independent of scale since the scale parameter cancels out in the expression, while the price coefficient incorporates scale Train & Weeks, 2005). Greene and Hensher (2010) show that the WTP space model can be expressed as a special case of the generalized multinomial logit model proposed by (Fiebig et al, 2010). The coefficients in the WTP space model are estimated in Stata 12 using the gmnl command (Gu et al, 2013).…”