2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generalized principal eigenvalue for Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations of ergodic type

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the generalized principal eigenvalue for Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations arising in a class of stochastic ergodic control. We give a necessary and sufficient condition so that the generalized principal eigenvalue of an HJB equation coincides with the optimal value of the corresponding ergodic control problem. We also investigate some qualitative properties of the generalized principal eigenvalue with respect to a perturbation of the potential function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, sinceū solves the first equation in (5.25) , we get−∆Φ + ∇H 0 (∇ū) · ∇Φ ≥ κ(−λ − κ|∇ū| 2 −m α )Φ.Using (5.27) andm → 0 as |x| → +∞, we obtain the claim. Reasoning as in[20, Proposition 4.3], or [28, Proposition 2.6], we get that R N e κūm dx < +∞, which concludes the estimate (5.26). With estimates(5.26) in force, the pointwise bounds stated in [28, Theorem 6.1] hold, namely there exist positive constants c 1 , c 2 , such that m(x) ≤ c 1 e −c2|x| on R N .…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Indeed, sinceū solves the first equation in (5.25) , we get−∆Φ + ∇H 0 (∇ū) · ∇Φ ≥ κ(−λ − κ|∇ū| 2 −m α )Φ.Using (5.27) andm → 0 as |x| → +∞, we obtain the claim. Reasoning as in[20, Proposition 4.3], or [28, Proposition 2.6], we get that R N e κūm dx < +∞, which concludes the estimate (5.26). With estimates(5.26) in force, the pointwise bounds stated in [28, Theorem 6.1] hold, namely there exist positive constants c 1 , c 2 , such that m(x) ≤ c 1 e −c2|x| on R N .…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The quadratic case (a) has been proved in [7,Theorem 2.5], and the second claim in (b) (i.e., the case where 2 < m < ∞ and N ≥ 2) is also suggested by [8,Theorem 2.4] in a slightly different context. The essential novelty of this paper, compared with [7,8], lies in the simultaneous derivation of (b) and (c) in combination with the convergence result obtained in part A. In particular, claim (c) for N ≥ 2 can be derived by passing to the limit of (b) as m → ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We refer, for instance, to [12] and references therein for more information on singular ergodic stochastic control and associated PDEs with gradient constraint. See also [6,7,8] for the stochastic control interpretation of λ m,β for 2 ≤ m < ∞. In this paper, we focus only on the PDE aspect and do not discuss its probabilistic counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the critical value is not necessarily the optimal value. For more recent work on the relation of the critical value of an elliptic HJB equation of the ergodic type and the optimal value of the control problem see Ichihara (2015).…”
Section: The Hjb Equation For the Ergodic Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%