2006
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-r34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components

Abstract: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Rhizobium leguminosarum genome

The genome sequence of the α-proteobacterial N2-fixing symbiont of legumes, Rhizobium leguminosarum, is described, revealing a 'core' and an 'accessory' component.

Abstract Background: Rhizob…
Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
259
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(109 reference statements)
8
259
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny shows Bradyrhizobium japonicum (cluster C) close to Caulobacter crescentus (cluster D) and distant from Mesorhizobium loti (cluster B). Moreover, within cluster B, the DnaJ-based phylogeny shows Ensifer meliloti closer to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Mesorhizobium loti closer to Brucella suis, which is in full agreement with the phylogeny proposed by Young et al (2006) based on the concatenated sequences of 638 proteins (the present study uses Brucella suis rather than Brucella melitensis) and with the multilocus tree of life presented by Ciccarelli et al (2006), and not concordant with the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny. Therefore, the possible HGT origin of dnaJ from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (cluster B) suggested by the G+C content analysis was not confirmed.…”
Section: The Alphaproteobacteriasupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny shows Bradyrhizobium japonicum (cluster C) close to Caulobacter crescentus (cluster D) and distant from Mesorhizobium loti (cluster B). Moreover, within cluster B, the DnaJ-based phylogeny shows Ensifer meliloti closer to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Mesorhizobium loti closer to Brucella suis, which is in full agreement with the phylogeny proposed by Young et al (2006) based on the concatenated sequences of 638 proteins (the present study uses Brucella suis rather than Brucella melitensis) and with the multilocus tree of life presented by Ciccarelli et al (2006), and not concordant with the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny. Therefore, the possible HGT origin of dnaJ from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (cluster B) suggested by the G+C content analysis was not confirmed.…”
Section: The Alphaproteobacteriasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Gupta & Sneath (2007) studied just proteobacteria, using the amino acid sequences of 10 protein-coding genes. A larger number of proteins (648) was used by Young et al (2006) to generate a phylogeny that shows the relationship of Rhizobium leguminosarum and its close relatives with completely sequenced genomes. These studies indicate that a large amount of core gene sequence information produces strongly supported and more resolved phylogenies, frequently in disagreement with 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhizobial genomes are subdivided into genome regions specific for their life stages, with chromosomal loci expressed during free-living phases in the soil and symbiosis loci expressed inside of host cells [13,14]. Symbiosis loci required for host nodulation and nitrogen fixation are clustered onto large plasmids or genomic islands [15][16][17][18][19], that can be transferred among lineages, presumably via conjugation [20][21][22]. Non-nodulating rhizobia are also common [23,24], and these strains often lack some or all of the characterized symbiosis loci [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to symbiotic plasmids, several rhizobial strains also contain one or more smaller, accessory plasmids, also termed non-symbiotic plasmids (Mercado-Blanco and Toro, 1996;Gonzalez et al, 2006;Stiens et al, 2006;Young et al, 2006). Some of these plasmids have been shown to transfer between populations of indigenous rhizobia (Mercado-Blanco and Toro, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%