1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7714(05)80116-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geochemistry of coprostanol in waters and surface sediments from Narragansett Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An external standard (4 µg 5α-cholestane in 100 µl heptane) was therefore added. Based on preliminary experimentation, extraction efficiency (reported to be essentially 100% by Mudge and Norris, 1997) was found to average >90%; a result which compares favourably with reported extraction efficiencies using this protocol (62%-96%: LeBlanc et al, 1992). Sterols were derivatised using 100 ml of 1:10 TMCS/BSFTA at 60 • C for 1 h. Identification of unknowns was achieved by comparison of relative retention times with authentic standards on GC-MS (GC as GC-FID; transfer 295 • C; Hewlett-Packard 5790B MSD; control/data handling by Hewlett-Packard ChemStation; SIM scanning through 50-520 atomic mass units (amu), 1 scan per second).…”
Section: Analytical Proceduressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…An external standard (4 µg 5α-cholestane in 100 µl heptane) was therefore added. Based on preliminary experimentation, extraction efficiency (reported to be essentially 100% by Mudge and Norris, 1997) was found to average >90%; a result which compares favourably with reported extraction efficiencies using this protocol (62%-96%: LeBlanc et al, 1992). Sterols were derivatised using 100 ml of 1:10 TMCS/BSFTA at 60 • C for 1 h. Identification of unknowns was achieved by comparison of relative retention times with authentic standards on GC-MS (GC as GC-FID; transfer 295 • C; Hewlett-Packard 5790B MSD; control/data handling by Hewlett-Packard ChemStation; SIM scanning through 50-520 atomic mass units (amu), 1 scan per second).…”
Section: Analytical Proceduressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Coprostanol is a fecal stanol that is formed during catabolism of cholesterol by indigenous bacteria present in the gut of humans and higher animals and is the primary stanol detected in domestic wastewater (50). For this reason, it has been proposed as a chemical indicator of human fecal pollution (13,20,44,45,47,81). Leeming et al (47) characterized fecal samples from numerous animals and found that coprostanol constituted ϳ60% of the total stanols in human feces.…”
Section: Genotypic Methods Used In Microbial Source Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering measurements in terms of mg g -1 , the variations in recovery percentages are very wide, ranging from 50 to 120%. Examples of such variations were found by LeBlanc et al 8 who obtained coprostanol recoveries varying between 62-96% processing standard mixture and spiked samples with methanol extractions. Eganhouse et al…”
Section: Recovery Of Steroidsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In test 1, the extraction was carried out with 80 mL of methanol (MERCK) reflux for 5 h (adapted from LeBlanc et al 8 ).…”
Section: Extraction Of Steroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%