2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2324391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geographic Dispersion of Google Search and the Market Reaction to Earnings Announcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this paper answers the call to study the role of the real-time interaction between market participants on the stock forum to understand the nature of posts that are created and read on the stock forum around corporate events (Miller and Skinner, 2015). Our evidence complements the recent literature examining how technology aids investors in gathering information, such as via Google search (Da et al , 2011; Chi and Shanthikumar, 2014), and highlights that technology enables investors to play an important dissemination role. Second, this paper contributes to the literature studying the impact of social media on market reaction to earnings news.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…First, this paper answers the call to study the role of the real-time interaction between market participants on the stock forum to understand the nature of posts that are created and read on the stock forum around corporate events (Miller and Skinner, 2015). Our evidence complements the recent literature examining how technology aids investors in gathering information, such as via Google search (Da et al , 2011; Chi and Shanthikumar, 2014), and highlights that technology enables investors to play an important dissemination role. Second, this paper contributes to the literature studying the impact of social media on market reaction to earnings news.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…To gauge the economic significance, we note that the estimated coefficient for DD Law indicates a drop in search volume of about 3.5% when 26 While the SVI data do not distinguish search activity by geographic location, our conjecture is reasonable based on recent evidence of state-level Google search activity. Specifically, Chi and Shanthikumar [2014] document that firms' Google search activity is disproportionately concentrated in their headquarter states, suggesting that individuals located near firms search for local firm information at greater rates than nonlocal individuals. 27 We also replicate our regression results based on robust standard errors clustered by firm, date, state, and event date (see table A2 of the online appendix).…”
Section: Effect Of Distracted Driving Laws On Google Search Volumementioning
confidence: 99%