The Geographies of Difference: The Production of the East Side,West Side, and Central City School

Abstract

Citywide constructs such as “West Side” or “South Side” are spatial codes that result from more than the informal conversations of city residents. This article shows how elementary school educators in one U.S. metropolitan school district participated in the production of a local knowledge of the East Side and West Side space and individual. It demonstrates how educators used these codes to name race and class, as well as to obscure the codes’ meanings. The article maps the convergence of institutional technologies and local educational knowledge whereby this knowledge resisted change and buttressed the citywide East Side–West Side relations and knowledge. The disjunctures in this knowledge base are also identified, as educators attempted to produce a knowledge of a third space that they termed “Central City.”

Examining the work of boundary spanning leaders in community contexts

“…These neighbourhoods are comprised of mostly Latino and Pacific Islander residents, many of whom came from low socio-economic backgrounds in comparison with the wider Mountain City area and very few of whom had attended college. For further information on this community see Buendia et al (2004). 5.…”

Three decades of choice in Edmonton schools

“…Alternative programs are tied to racialized and classed city spaces (cf. Buendia et al 2004) and to the differential ability and interest of groups in appropriating cultural and social capital (cf. Delgado-Gaitan and Trueba 1991).…”

Inclusive education and social inequality: an update of the question and some geographical considerations

“…In other contexts, the same concern raises questions of co-ordination between official agencies working alongside each other within the same urban areas (Milbourne 2005), where such policies may serve to launch processes of community development backed by the broad participation of a number of institutions (Dyson and Raffo 2007;Nevarez and Wood 2007). The same considerations apply to the socio-educational concern for the prevention of violence (Buendía et al 2004;Franchi 2004) and to institutional decisions with respect to education that are likely to perpetuate and sometimes aggravate the disadvantages experience by young people in some neighbourhoods (Le Fur 2005;Barr et al 2006).…”