2016
DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geography of Complex Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
268
0
15

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 474 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
14
268
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Two recently developed strands of literature can shed some light on the factors that explain the variation of spatial concentration across activities: the literature on urban concentration (4) and the literature on economic complexity (5)(6)(7). The literature on urban concentration shows evidence that economic outputs increase faster than city size (they scale super-linearly) (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recently developed strands of literature can shed some light on the factors that explain the variation of spatial concentration across activities: the literature on urban concentration (4) and the literature on economic complexity (5)(6)(7). The literature on urban concentration shows evidence that economic outputs increase faster than city size (they scale super-linearly) (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple economic activities, for example, tend to be more ubiquitous, while complex economic activities will be more unequally distributed. This empirical pattern holds for both products (Hidalgo & Hausmann ) and technologies (Balland & Rigby ). Interestingly, these complex activities are not randomly distributed; they tend to be disproportionally found in regions with a diverse set of knowledge and knowhow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In innovation economics, heterogeneities between technologies are usually investigated with respect to the complexity of knowledge combinations (Antonelli, 2011;Balland & Rigby, 2017;Fleming & Sorenson, 2001), the learning processes according to the nature of the knowledge base (Asheim, 2007;Moodysson, 2008), or the development stage of a technology and its relatedness to existing knowledge (Anderson & Tushman, 1990;Heimeriks & Boschma, 2014). Implicitly or explicitly, each approach may bear different indications for the predominant spatial structure and relevance of collaborative networks.…”
Section: Technological Heterogeneity Of Randd Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%