The geography of London's recent beer brewing revolution

Abstract

In this paper we examine the recent rapid growth of new breweries in London and the reasons behind it. At the turn of the millennium, just a handful of breweries was operating in London, but by 2016 this number had risen to over 85. Using open data from the Companies House database augmented with other online and printed sources, we show that the rapid growth of breweries, particularly since 2011, has exhibited spatial patterning. Ripley's K analysis reveals that as soon as we see new breweries emerging, they are clustering in space. Cluster analyses reveal that Bermondsey and Hackney are particular locational hotspots for brewing. Closer investigation of the Bermondsey cluster highlights the importance of a number of interacting physical, social and economic factors in helping foster this growth. We show that the railways and the spaces they have created, the general atmosphere of cooperation and sharing surrounding the industry in the city, macro‐economic and fiscal changes, foreign influence, technology and markets have all played their part in the recent spatial and temporal evolution of brewing in the city.

To cluster or not to cluster? Spatial determinants of closures in the American craft brewing industry

“…In this paper, we study geographic patterns of, and locational factors associated with, craft brewery closures in three American metropolitan areas. As Dennet and Page () and Nilsson et al () conclude, craft breweries have a tendency to cluster, as there are a number of demand and supply side benefits of doing so. The relatively scarce literature on the relationship between spatial concentration and firm failure rates have mainly focused on manufacturing firms and supply side benefits of clustering at a regional scale (De Silva & McComb, ).…”

Enthusiasm, craft and authenticity on the High Street: micropubs as ‘community fixers’

“…In the midst of such debates about the importance of cultivating community on the High Street, the rise of the micropub is worthy of comment. Not to be confused with US-style 'brewpubs' or microbrewery 'tap rooms' that are making their presence felt in larger UK towns and citiesespecially London (Dennett and Page, 2017) micropubs are essentially 'pop-up' venues in small, vacant, retail units that would be unsuitable for more traditional pubs and do not have room for brewing on the premise. Despite their limited sizethey seldom seat more than 20 drinkers at a time -they are attracting favourable headlines because of their perceived role as communityminded, sociable premises which are bringing vacant and even derelict spaces back into life (Hawkes, 2011).…”

Beyond the cluster: A case study of pipelines and buzz in the glocal relational space of the glove‐related industry of Shikoku, Japan

“…Previous studies postulated that industrial clusters exist primarily because of the benefits of enhanced knowledge creation that occur when co-located firms undertake similar activities (Depner & Bathelt, 2005). Thus, regions with well-developed linkages have an exceptional ability to produce new ideas (Dennett & Page, 2017;Lawson & Lorenz, 2010;Malmberg, 1996). On a regional level, innovation is the critical factor in successful economic development.…”

“…Source: Small and Medium Enterprise Agency (2010) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] linkages formed by social and cultural bonds. Thus, regions with well-developed linkages have an exceptional ability to produce new ideas (Dennett & Page, 2017;Lawson & Lorenz, 2010;Malmberg, 1996). At the same time, these clusters' leading firms function as a strong nucleus, providing the guiding force for their respective local industriescorresponding to the "flying geese" metaphor in Akamatsu's theory (Akamatsu, 1956(Akamatsu, , 1961.…”