2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-8252(01)00036-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geology and petroleum potential of the North Afghan platform and adjacent areas (northern Afghanistan, with parts of southern Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bourgeois et al (1997) restored deformation pattern within the Tajik basin, suggesting a rotated indenter whereas Leith and Alvarez (1985) suggest that the Tajik FTB is pressed against the slope of the Gissar Range. Brookfield and Hashmat (2001) suggest that westward directed gravitational gliding of the foldand-thrust belt might be triggered by the northward movement of the Pamir. Using the classification of Macedo and Marshak (1999), basin controlled vs. indenter controlled, the Tajik basin would be classified as an indenter controlled basin, because trend lines converges at the apex of the salient, which is to find in the north of the Pamir.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimental Results With the Tajik Foldand-thmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bourgeois et al (1997) restored deformation pattern within the Tajik basin, suggesting a rotated indenter whereas Leith and Alvarez (1985) suggest that the Tajik FTB is pressed against the slope of the Gissar Range. Brookfield and Hashmat (2001) suggest that westward directed gravitational gliding of the foldand-thrust belt might be triggered by the northward movement of the Pamir. Using the classification of Macedo and Marshak (1999), basin controlled vs. indenter controlled, the Tajik basin would be classified as an indenter controlled basin, because trend lines converges at the apex of the salient, which is to find in the north of the Pamir.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimental Results With the Tajik Foldand-thmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Late Permian-Triassic (possibly Late Triassic/Early Jurassic [56]) the Iranian Block collided with the southern margin of Eurasia, and the Paleotethys Ocean was closed [29,57,58]. A series of structural faults formed in the collision event separate the basement of the basin into numerous paleo-uplifts and graben structures [59][60][61][62]. Hereafter, the Amu-Darya Basin entered the development stage of rift basin [63] and a period of stable settlement.…”
Section: Sedimentary-sequence Evolution Characteristics Of Callovian-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stampfli & Borel 2002;Barrier & Vrielynck 2008, 2017Wilmsen et al 2009;Zanchi et al 2009Zanchi et al , 2012, a number of new or rejuvenated sedimentary basins formed north of the main collision zone in Central Asia, including the Amu Darya Basin (extending mainly across Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) and the Afghan-Tajik Basin (extending across Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Afghanistan) (e.g. Thomas et al 1999a;Melikhov 2000Melikhov , 2013Melikhov , 2017Brookfield & Hashmat 2001;Ulmishek 2004;Klett et al 2006;FĂŒ rsich et al 2015;Brunet et al 2017). The evolution of these two basins was closely linked from the Late Palaeozoic onwards; indeed, during Jurassic times the two basins were connected.…”
Section: Geological Evolution Of Central Asian Basins and The Westernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jurassic -Cretaceous was characterized by a general planation of the previously formed relief (e.g. Makarov 1977;Chediya 1986;Burbank et al 1999;Allen et al 2001;Cunningham et al 2003;Jolivet et al 2010Jolivet et al , 2013Jolivet et al , 2015, providing sediments to these newly forming extensional basins (Brookfield & Hashmat 2001;Klett et al 2006;FĂŒ rsich et al 2015;Brunet et al 2017).…”
Section: Geological Evolution Of Central Asian Basins and The Westernmentioning
confidence: 99%