2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-004-0374-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometry of minimal surfaces of finite genus II; nonexistence of one limit end examples

Abstract: We prove that for every nonnegative integer g, there is a bound on the number of ends that a complete embedded minimal surface M ⊂ R 3 of genus g and finite topology can have. This bound on the finite number of ends when M has at least two ends implies that M has finite stability index which is bounded by a constant that only depends on its genus.Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 53A10, Secondary 49Q05, 53C42

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since outside a compact subset of M the surface has genus zero, the blown-up limit M ∞ has genus zero. By the classification results in [16] for such M ∞ , on this scale, the surface M has the appearance of either a catenoid or a two limit end genus zero minimal surface near p n .…”
Section: Length(γmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Since outside a compact subset of M the surface has genus zero, the blown-up limit M ∞ has genus zero. By the classification results in [16] for such M ∞ , on this scale, the surface M has the appearance of either a catenoid or a two limit end genus zero minimal surface near p n .…”
Section: Length(γmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We call this procedure blowing-up by the scale of topology. This scale was defined and used in [74,75] to prove that any properly embedded minimal surface of finite genus has bounded curvature and is recurrent for Brownian motion. We now explain the elements of this new scale.…”
Section: Sup |K Mn∩b(s(t)r) | → ∞ As N → ∞ For Any T ∈ R and R >mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the uniformly locally simply connected property of {M n } n , we prove that its limits are properly embedded nonsimply connected minimal surfaces with genus at most g and possibly infinitely many ends. The infinite topology limits are discarded by an application of either a descriptive Theorem of the geometry of properly embedded minimal surfaces in R 3 with finite genus and two limit ends (Meeks, Pérez and Ros [74], see also Theorem 32 below), or a nonexistence Theorem for properly embedded minimal surfaces in R 3 with finite genus and one limit end (Meeks, Pérez and Ros [75] or Theorem 31 below). Hence, any possible limit M of a subsequence of {M n } n must be a finite total curvature surface or a helicoid with positive genus at most g. A surgery argument allows one to modify the surfaces M n by replacing compact pieces of M n close to the limit M by a finite number of disks, obtaining a new surface M n with strictly less topology than M n and which is not minimal in the replaced part.…”
Section: Theorem 29 [76] For Every Nonnegative Integer G There Exismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations