1990
DOI: 10.1112/plms/s3-61.2.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geometry of Shape Spaces

Abstract: In [2] D. G. Kendall introduced shape spaces which classsified TV-tuples of points in U K and explained their role for statistics. The aim of this paper is to study such shape spaces and, in particular, to explore the corresponding spaces for points on spheres. The ultimate purpose of the work is to be able to apply statistical techniques to observations where only the shape of the observations is significant. It is apparent that the geometry of the shape space is critical in determining the type of statistica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He was followed by Matheron [33] who founded, with Serra, the French School of Mathematical Morphology and by D. Kendall [24], [26], [27] and his colleagues, e.g., Small [42]. In addition, and independently, a rich body of theory and practice for the statistical analysis of shapes has been developed by Bookstein [4], Dryden and Mardia [13], Carne [5], and Cootes et al [8]. Except for the mostly theoretical work of Fréchet and Matheron, the tools developed by these authors are very much tied to the point-wise representation of the shapes they study: objects are represented by a finite number of salient points or landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was followed by Matheron [33] who founded, with Serra, the French School of Mathematical Morphology and by D. Kendall [24], [26], [27] and his colleagues, e.g., Small [42]. In addition, and independently, a rich body of theory and practice for the statistical analysis of shapes has been developed by Bookstein [4], Dryden and Mardia [13], Carne [5], and Cootes et al [8]. Except for the mostly theoretical work of Fréchet and Matheron, the tools developed by these authors are very much tied to the point-wise representation of the shapes they study: objects are represented by a finite number of salient points or landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , φ (2) n−1 ) by a rotation around the axis defined by φ (1) n , (ii) we have φ (1) n = −φ (2) n and (φ (1) 1 , . .…”
Section: ·3 the (Un)importance Of The Orientation Of Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , φ (2) n−1 ) by a rotoinversion around the axis defined by φ (1) n . Assume the first case is true.…”
Section: ·3 the (Un)importance Of The Orientation Of Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bookestein [10], Dryden and Mardia [11], Cootes et al [13], Carne [14], and Small [15] developed the basic theory into practical statistical approaches for analyzing objects using probability distributions of shapes. From the viewpoint of applications, shape theory has been used to solve some problems in image analysis such as identifying landmarks of face images [12], or monitoring activities in a certain region from video data [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%