1971
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(71)90725-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The giant dipole resonance in the transition region for the neodymium isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
85
1
3

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
85
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…165 Ho(γ,n) 164 Ho reaction cross sections were compared with the available experimental data [11][12]. In general our calculations for all level density models are in good agreement with experimental data obtained from EXFOR [13].…”
Section: B-229supporting
confidence: 64%
“…165 Ho(γ,n) 164 Ho reaction cross sections were compared with the available experimental data [11][12]. In general our calculations for all level density models are in good agreement with experimental data obtained from EXFOR [13].…”
Section: B-229supporting
confidence: 64%
“…For instance, the peak splitting of the giant dipole resonance (GDR), which is caused by the different frequencies of oscillation along the long and short axes, has been observed in experiments [4]. A typical example of the shape phase transition from spherical to deformed ground states and the evolution of deformation splitting in GDRs have been observed in Nd and Sm isotopes [2,3,4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the inset of Fig. 2, the total photoabsorption cross section (solid line) calculated in the SRPA is compared with the experimental data [20]. The shape of the GDR depends on the parameter f , whereas it is little affected by the parameter v 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 but for 142 Nd. In the inset the total photoabsorption cross section calculated from the strength function in the SRPA (solid line) is compared with the experimental data (dots) [20]. The dotted line in the inset denotes the result calculated with f = 0.9. f (See the dotted line in the inset of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%