2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.01.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Giant Monopole Resonance in the Sn Isotopes: Why is Tin so “Fluffy”?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[50], these features seem to suggest that the K τ = (−550 ± 100) MeV obtained in refs. [18,19] may suffer from the same ambiguities already encountered in earlier attempts [61] to extract the K 0 and K sat,2 of infinite matter from finite-nuclei extrapolations. This problem remains as an open challenge, and both experimental and theoretical insights are needed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[50], these features seem to suggest that the K τ = (−550 ± 100) MeV obtained in refs. [18,19] may suffer from the same ambiguities already encountered in earlier attempts [61] to extract the K 0 and K sat,2 of infinite matter from finite-nuclei extrapolations. This problem remains as an open challenge, and both experimental and theoretical insights are needed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, using the empirical constraints of While the estimated value of −477 MeV K sat,2 −241 MeV in the present work has a small overlap with the constraint of K τ = (−550 ± 100) MeV obtained in refs. [18,19] from recent measurements of the isotopic dependence of the GMR in even-A Sn isotopes, the magnitude of the constrained K τ is still significantly larger than that of −477 MeV K sat,2 −241 MeV. Recently, there are several works [49,50] on extracting the value of the K sat,2 parameter based on the idea initiated by Blaizot and collaborators that the values of both K 0 and K sat,2 should be extracted from the same consistent theoretical model that successfully reproduces the experimental GMR energies of a variety of nuclei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The properties of asymmetric nuclear systems have also been studied in terrestrial laboratories in past years [2,3], but many aspects still rely on theoretical models. Constraints on the behavior of the symmetry energy above nuclear saturation density have been coming from experiments with new neutron-rich radioactive beams, and in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, giant monopole resonances [4], isobaric analog states [5], or meson production (pions [6] and kaons [7]) in heavy-ion collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nEoS governs many aspects of astrophysics such as neutron star physics and nucleosynthesis during the explosive death of stars [4][5][6][7]. In terrestrial environments, the nEoS is integral in explaining the neutron skin thickness of heavy nuclei, collective excitations of nuclei, and the dynamics of heavy-ion collisions [8][9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%