2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gilbert Johnson Keerthi distance algorithm coupled with computational fluid dynamics applied to gas explosion simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the findings of the current paper are not possible to extract from those studies. The model limitations identified in this paper contributed to the disagreements between the previous RANS results [ [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] and experimental data. The present work is limited to a-priori analysis and consequently does not…”
Section: It Can Further Be Seen Frommentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the findings of the current paper are not possible to extract from those studies. The model limitations identified in this paper contributed to the disagreements between the previous RANS results [ [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] and experimental data. The present work is limited to a-priori analysis and consequently does not…”
Section: It Can Further Be Seen Frommentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The BML modelling methodologies discussed in this paper are still frequently used in the context of explosions or internal combustion engines [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. However, the findings of the current paper are not possible to extract from those studies.…”
Section: It Can Further Be Seen Frommentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[17] Further details of the code can be found elsewhere. [18,19] We now turn our attention to combustion modelling. The combustion source term is modelled in accordance with the following expression:…”
Section: Shock Towards Kinetic Explosion Simulation (Stokes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety distance from a vapor cloud rapid deflagration was investigated by Li and Hao [7] using a numerical tool. In the context of a gas cloud, numerical simulations in environments with complex geometry were performed by Vianna and Cant [8], Ferreira and Vianna [9], [10], and Quaresma et al [11]. These researchers used a computational tool with meshes based on Porosity Distributed Resistance (PDR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%