1996
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3251:tggots>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Geometry of the Slow Manifold in the Lorenz–Krishnamurthy Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many indications that atmospheric and oceanic flows characterized by an O(1) Rossby number and initially in a state of 'balance' -here meaning a hypothetical state void of inertia-gravity waves (IGWs) -cannot remain that way owing to the spontaneous generation of small-amplitude IGWs (Lorenz & Krishnamurthy 1987;Bokhove & Shepherd 1996;Camassa & Tin 1996;Warn 1997;Ford, McIntyre & Norton 2000;Plougonven & Zeitlin 2002;Plougonven, Teitelbaum & Zeitlin 2003;Vanneste & Yavneh 2004;Vanneste 2004). At O(1) Rossby numbers, however, there is no consensus on the exact meaning of the terms geostrophic adjustment, Lighthill emission, and spontaneous-adjustment emission (SAE; see Ford et al 2000;Saujani & Shepherd 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many indications that atmospheric and oceanic flows characterized by an O(1) Rossby number and initially in a state of 'balance' -here meaning a hypothetical state void of inertia-gravity waves (IGWs) -cannot remain that way owing to the spontaneous generation of small-amplitude IGWs (Lorenz & Krishnamurthy 1987;Bokhove & Shepherd 1996;Camassa & Tin 1996;Warn 1997;Ford, McIntyre & Norton 2000;Plougonven & Zeitlin 2002;Plougonven, Teitelbaum & Zeitlin 2003;Vanneste & Yavneh 2004;Vanneste 2004). At O(1) Rossby numbers, however, there is no consensus on the exact meaning of the terms geostrophic adjustment, Lighthill emission, and spontaneous-adjustment emission (SAE; see Ford et al 2000;Saujani & Shepherd 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main result of this paper, Theorem 1, and its extensions presented in Section 10, consists of a tool that, for systems of the form (2.1), is comparable in its applicability and efficiency to the celebrated Melnikov method. As such, it is useful both for solving applied problems [6,7,38], and for unifying existing perturbation-theoretic approaches to detection of homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits in near-integrable systems. In this latter vein, this paper already develops a unifying approach to the results of references [6,59,23,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) and soQ l (T ) − Q u (T ) = O (ε α ), P l (T ) − P u (T ) = O (ε α ). (7.8) Consider the function N(a, b, I ) = N ε (a ε , b ε , I ε , ψ ε ) = H (x, I ) − F (I ), where F (I ) = H (X(I ), I ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system describes coupled Rossby waves and gravity waves. It was mainly investigated from the existence of a slow manifold point of view [2][3][4][5]. Among other studies regarding 5-dimensional Lorenz system we mention Hamiltonian structure [6], chaotic behaviour [7][8][9], and analytic integrability [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%