The Good, The Bad, and The Street: Does ‘street culture’ affect offender communication and reception in restorative justice?

Abstract

This article examines whether and how ‘street culture’ affects offender communication and reception in restorative justice. Drawing on an archival dataset of police-led restorative justice conferences, we analysed the relationship between street cultural capital and offenders’ ability to communicate during restorative justice. We explored how offenders’ social background, measured by street cultural capital, and/or communication abilities affect third-party perceptions of offender sincerity and their likelihood to reoffend. Results indicate that the embodiment of street cultural capital may affect offender participation in restorative justice. Socioeconomically disadvantaged offenders appeared more likely to experience communication difficulties, and were less likely to be perceived by third parties as sincere or willing to desist from offending. These findings are considered within a theoretical framework that draws on Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital, Skeggs’ notion of inscription and Loftus’ research on ‘attitude tests’.

‘It is successful, and if it is successful, it reduces crime, and it can make the victims happier’: volunteers’ perceptions of working in restorative justice

“…In contrast to the findings, however, recent research concluded that letters of apology were significantly effective for both property and low-level offences (Wager et al , 2015). In addition, an imbalance in the verbal skills required for direct communication has been reported within the literature, often due to the culture, ethnicity or socioeconomic background of the individuals (Willis, 2020; Willis and Hoyle, 2019). An indirect approach such as a letter of apology may in fact be preferable for some individuals and should not be dismissed entirely.…”

Restorative justice in Indonesia corruption crime: a utopia

“…The role of pardons in restorative justice remains peripheral because interpersonal forgiveness has been considered a 'gift' that should not be forced on victims in restorative justice (Suzuki & Jenkins, 2022). Restorative justice processes can involve victims, offenders, and community members meeting to discuss the harms caused by offending behaviour (Willis & Hoyle, 2022). Restorative justice is an approach that emphasizes more on conditions necessary to bring about justice and equilibrium for both criminal perpetrators and victims.…”

“…The Crime and Courts Act of 2013 has been the legislation that has brought restorative justice into effect in the United Kingdom. Since April 2014, the courts have had the authority to postpone sentencing to provide victims of adult offenders with the opportunity to participate in a restorative justice practice (Willis & Hoyle, 2022). Restorative justice is also endorsed by a variety of legislations, including The Code of Practice for Victims of Crime 2020, the Code of Practice for Conditional Cautions -Adults, the Code of Practice for Youth Conditional Caution, the Director's Guidance on Adult Conditional Cautioning, the Director's Guidance on Youth Conditional Cautioning, and the Cautioning and Diversion Act (Crown Prosecution Service, 2019).…”

Exploring the Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practice in Criminal Law System

“…The concept of the "ideal victim" highlights the importance of considering the victim's experience in restorative processes [10]. Although RJ has been applied in a variety of contexts, concerns about potential power imbalances and discrimination remain [11].…”