2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-017-1660-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The good, the bad and the outliers: automated detection of errors and outliers from groundwater hydrographs

Abstract: Suspicious groundwater-level observations are common and can arise for many reasons ranging from an unforeseen biophysical process to bore failure and data management errors. Unforeseen observations may provide valuable insights that challenge existing expectations and can be deemed outliers, while monitoring and data handling failures can be deemed errors, and, if ignored, may compromise trend analysis and groundwater model calibration. Ideally, outliers and errors should be identified but to date this has be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Von Asmuth et al (2002) introduced a new type of TFN models based on the principles of convolution and predefined impulse response functions. This type of model has been applied in a variety of studies including the decomposition of hydrological stresses (von Asmuth and Knotters 2004;von Asmuth et al 2008;Shapoori et al 2015b), the estimation of aquifer parameters (e.g., Obergfell et al 2013;Shapoori et al 2015a), the statistical interpolation of groundwater time series (Peterson et al 2018), the analysis of nation-wide groundwater monitoring networks (Zaadnoordijk et al 2018), and the estimation of recharge (Obergfell et al 2019). The concepts of TFN modeling based on impulse response functions have been incorporated in the commercially available software Menyanthes (von Asmuth et al 2012) and the open source software HydroSight (Peterson and Western 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Von Asmuth et al (2002) introduced a new type of TFN models based on the principles of convolution and predefined impulse response functions. This type of model has been applied in a variety of studies including the decomposition of hydrological stresses (von Asmuth and Knotters 2004;von Asmuth et al 2008;Shapoori et al 2015b), the estimation of aquifer parameters (e.g., Obergfell et al 2013;Shapoori et al 2015a), the statistical interpolation of groundwater time series (Peterson et al 2018), the analysis of nation-wide groundwater monitoring networks (Zaadnoordijk et al 2018), and the estimation of recharge (Obergfell et al 2019). The concepts of TFN modeling based on impulse response functions have been incorporated in the commercially available software Menyanthes (von Asmuth et al 2012) and the open source software HydroSight (Peterson and Western 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the mentioned large, non-scientific datasets as used in our model case, and when this is done prior to the parameter estimation, it is hard to determine which observations with large residuals represent observational outliers, or model structural deficiencies, or non-optimal parameter values. Statistically sound outlier filtering often requires timeseries of observations (Jeong et al, 2017;Peterson et al, 2018), whereas our observation dataset is comprised of many observation points with only a single or few observations in time, and only few observation points with a whole time series. Furthermore, outliers can also be detected based on spatial patterns (Bárdossy and Kundzewicz, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the approach, the following procedure was applied to each bore for hydrograph interpolation. Identify and remove erroneous and outlier water level observations using the automatic procedure from Peterson et al (). Erroneous observations were identified using heuristics, for example, maximum acceptable level change per day and the maximum acceptable duration of periods of constant water level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Identify and remove erroneous and outlier water level observations using the automatic procedure from Peterson et al (2017)…”
Section: Evaluation Of Interpolation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%