2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: Source of Cooperation or Contention?

Abstract: Forum papers are thought-provoking opinion pieces or essays founded in fact, sometimes containing speculation, on a civil engineering topic of general interest and relevance to the readership of the journal. The views expressed in this Forum article do not necessarily reflect the views of ASCE or the Editorial Board of the journal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the location of the GERD in a deep gorge, the surface area is relatively small compared to its volume, and the evaporative demand is lower than in the HAD [4]. Hence, water losses from evaporation in the GERD are much smaller than in the HAD [4]. Mean annual losses from both reservoirs, HAD and GERD, may be 16% less than the loss from the HAD operating alone [21].…”
Section: Impacts Downstreammentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the location of the GERD in a deep gorge, the surface area is relatively small compared to its volume, and the evaporative demand is lower than in the HAD [4]. Hence, water losses from evaporation in the GERD are much smaller than in the HAD [4]. Mean annual losses from both reservoirs, HAD and GERD, may be 16% less than the loss from the HAD operating alone [21].…”
Section: Impacts Downstreammentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mulat and Moges (2014) [21] estimate a reduction of 7% in electricity generation of the HAD, once the GERD is online. Taye et al (2016) [4] on the contrary argue that, with the GERD online, the minimum annual net benefit for Sudan and Egypt may increase from $4.9-$5.6 billion in the agricultural and energy sector. Besides greater net benefits with increasing storage in Ethiopia, floods and droughts will be reduced, and the hydrological uncertainties will be nullified, particularly during low flow periods [20].…”
Section: Impacts Downstreammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations