2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41999-019-00249-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GUSS test as a good indicator to evaluate dysphagia in healthy older people: a multicenter reliability and validity study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 4, the Cronbach's alpha values for scales were all found to be higher than 0.7, which is the threshold value recommended in Umay's guideline [63]. Hence, all scales had a high reliability and could therefore be considered to be a solid foundation for further studies.…”
Section: Reliability Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table 4, the Cronbach's alpha values for scales were all found to be higher than 0.7, which is the threshold value recommended in Umay's guideline [63]. Hence, all scales had a high reliability and could therefore be considered to be a solid foundation for further studies.…”
Section: Reliability Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…From a total of 300 questionnaires distributed online, 279 questionnaires were completed. After omitting questionnaires with incomplete answers and from other cities, the total number of valid questionnaires obtained was 223 (80.5%), which is suitable for social science research [63]. Out of the total sample of 223 respondents, 65.34% were male and 34.66% were female.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[24] It is a wellvalidated tests whose sensitivity and speci city were reported to be high in many studies conducted for stroke patients and recently for healthy older people. [25] GUSS consists of indirect and direct swallowing tests; in indirect swallowing test, the vigilance of the patient, cough and/or throat clearing, and saliva swallowing are observed, while in the direct swallowing test, deglutition, involuntary cough, drooling, and voice change are observed when three types of foods with different consistency, namely semisolid, liquid, solid are provided to the patient. It classi es the subjects into four levels; 0-9 points: severe dysphagia and aspiration risk, 10-14 points: moderate dysphagia and aspiration risk, 15-19 points: mild dysphagia and aspiration risk, 20 points: normal.…”
Section: Assessment Of Dysphagiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative evaluation and diagnosis are needed to improve accuracy in determining the suggestion of a rehabilitation scheme for patients (Saitoh et al 2018). Some screening tests based on eating assessment performed by a qualified clinical person were reported with several test approaches, such as 10-item Eating Assessment (EAT 10), volume viscosity swallow test (VVST), and the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) (Benfield et al 2020;Umay et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%