1980
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/43/11/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hall effect in polycrystalline and powdered semiconductors

Abstract: T h e characterisation of the transport properties of semiconducting material through a combination of Hall effect and resistivity measurements is as important in understanding the electrical transport properties of polycrystalline and powdered semiconductors as it is for single-crystal semiconductors. However, the interpretation of these measurements for polycrystalline and powdered semiconductors is more complicated due to the presence of grain boundaries and trapped interface charges which lead to inter-gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
293
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 560 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
13
293
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To a large extent, the temperature-dependent part of the resistivity, Seebeck coefficient, Hall coefficient, and mobility can be scaled for all three samples, strongly indicating that the electrical transport is the same in these three samples. In addition, the temperature dependence of mobility does not show the typical boundary scattering behavior, which therefore further corroborates our assertion that the composition variation at the inter-grain boundary is secondary, as compared to the micro-morphology [29]. Thus, it is noteworthy that the difference in the values of the thermal conductivity of the bulk-reference and the Na-and K-treated samples could be attributed to the very distinct micromorphology of their inter-grain boundaries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To a large extent, the temperature-dependent part of the resistivity, Seebeck coefficient, Hall coefficient, and mobility can be scaled for all three samples, strongly indicating that the electrical transport is the same in these three samples. In addition, the temperature dependence of mobility does not show the typical boundary scattering behavior, which therefore further corroborates our assertion that the composition variation at the inter-grain boundary is secondary, as compared to the micro-morphology [29]. Thus, it is noteworthy that the difference in the values of the thermal conductivity of the bulk-reference and the Na-and K-treated samples could be attributed to the very distinct micromorphology of their inter-grain boundaries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Only when sufficient thermal energy is provided to re-orient adjacent grains, activate dopants, or move passivating species to grain boundaries will the potential barriers at high angle grain boundaries be lowered sufficiently such that a percolation network that facilitates electronic transport can form. To test this hypothesis and generalize the conclusions of our model, we prepared electrodes from colloidal particles with several different carrier concentrations and interfacial state densities (Supplementary Information), which are the two parameters that most influence the formation of potential barriers 44 . When the doping level is low and the interface state concentration is high, large potential barriers are expected to form; conversely, high doping levels and low interface state concentrations yield negligible barriers 44 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this hypothesis and generalize the conclusions of our model, we prepared electrodes from colloidal particles with several different carrier concentrations and interfacial state densities (Supplementary Information), which are the two parameters that most influence the formation of potential barriers 44 . When the doping level is low and the interface state concentration is high, large potential barriers are expected to form; conversely, high doping levels and low interface state concentrations yield negligible barriers 44 . These predictions agreed with the experimentally measured photocurrent and charge transport characteristics measured by C-AFM (Supplementary Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In polycrystalline SnO 2 , the electrical conduction mechanism is related to the grain boundaries. It is known that the electrical conductivity increases with the increase in the crystallite sizes of the polycrystalline because of the decrease of the grain boundaries number (the decrease of the carriers scattering on these grain boundaries) [24,25]. Fig.…”
Section: Ijasr|vol 01|issue 10|2015mentioning
confidence: 99%