2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Healthy Aging Index analyzed over 15 years in the general population: The Doetinchem Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the AUCs of several inflammatory markers were found to be related to frailty, no associations were observed between them and the increase in frailty over the five-year period (Supplementary correlation tables, tab "Frailty_change"). Secondly, to investigate the risk of becoming frail prospectively over a longer period of time, we selected a subgroup of individuals who were 'healthy' and thus were likely to have a low, favorable frailty index score at the start of our study; healthy at study baseline was defined according to an alternative health index that could be assessed at study baseline (Healthy Ageing Index score, score of 9 or 10 out of 10, higher score being more favorable; 31 women and 27 men; Figure 6A) (Dieteren et al, 2020). Then we investigated within these selected 'healthy' participants whether those with continuously higher (or lower) levels of inflammatory markers had a higher frailty index score at study endpoint, and thus became frailer over time.…”
Section: Trajectories Of Inflammatory Markers Related To An Increase In Frailtymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the AUCs of several inflammatory markers were found to be related to frailty, no associations were observed between them and the increase in frailty over the five-year period (Supplementary correlation tables, tab "Frailty_change"). Secondly, to investigate the risk of becoming frail prospectively over a longer period of time, we selected a subgroup of individuals who were 'healthy' and thus were likely to have a low, favorable frailty index score at the start of our study; healthy at study baseline was defined according to an alternative health index that could be assessed at study baseline (Healthy Ageing Index score, score of 9 or 10 out of 10, higher score being more favorable; 31 women and 27 men; Figure 6A) (Dieteren et al, 2020). Then we investigated within these selected 'healthy' participants whether those with continuously higher (or lower) levels of inflammatory markers had a higher frailty index score at study endpoint, and thus became frailer over time.…”
Section: Trajectories Of Inflammatory Markers Related To An Increase In Frailtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The healthy aging index was measured at study baseline and was used to select a subgroup of participants that was 'healthy' at the start of follow-up. The score is based on health deficits defined by systolic blood pressure, plasma glucose levels, creatinine levels, lung function (forced vital capacity), and general cognitive function (Nooyens et al, 2011), as described elsewhere (Dieteren et al, 2020). Except for plasma glucose levels, the deficits were comparable to some of those included in the frailty index score.…”
Section: Healthy Aging Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAI was a modified Physiological Index of Comorbidity [6], was developed to cover a broad range of health indicators over multiple organ systems and capture subclinical decrements in function [7]. HAI had been developed in the Western countries, and was a valid predictor for mortality, disability, and cardiovascular diseases among older adults [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In particular, Dieteren et al [13] studied development in individual HAI scores over the life course among people aged between 30 and 70 years in the Netherlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAI had been developed in the Western countries, and was a valid predictor for mortality, disability, and cardiovascular diseases among older adults [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In particular, Dieteren et al [13] studied development in individual HAI scores over the life course among people aged between 30 and 70 years in the Netherlands. A recent study constructed the Chinese Healthy Ageing Index (CHAI, range 0-12, lower score was better), and shown that mean CHAI score was 5.6 in 2011, and that the younger, more educated and married people were more likely to have a higher prevalence of "ideal CHAI" (0-2) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were found in a study of the Spanish population, with a prevalence of healthy ageing ranging from 4.5 to 49.2%, depending on the criteria used to define it [ 4 ]. Recently, Dieteren and colleagues [ 13 ] published results of the ageing trajectories of a cohort of older adults, using the Healthy Ageing Index (HAI). The HAI predicts mortality, independently of the age or the presence of comorbidities, based on five physiological indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%