2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The heat/mass transfer analogy for a backward facing step

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies [132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141] have demonstrated the applicability and the limitations of the analogy given by Eq. (28).…”
Section: Heat Momentum and Mass Transfer Analogy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies [132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141] have demonstrated the applicability and the limitations of the analogy given by Eq. (28).…”
Section: Heat Momentum and Mass Transfer Analogy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nu/Sh = (Pr/Sc) n / n = 1/3, Pr air = 0.71, Sc naph = 2.28 [139] Backward-facing step Heat-mass transfer/heat in air, naphthalene in air (sublimation)…”
Section: Heat Momentum and Mass Transfer Analogy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The naphthalene sublimation technique has been applied for decades, and is still in use as attested by Refs. [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , from years 2016 to 2017. In this respect, the data here presented may provide quantitative information on issues that are not normally addressed by traditional research articles.…”
Section: Specifications Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors found heat transfer enhancement by the comparison of BFS heat transfer values of water and the mixture. Mittal et al [35] stress intrusion effects of flow measurement on heat transfer calculations of turbulent BFS heat transfer and propose an analogy between heat and mass transfer. Authors used naphthalene since they can measure the mass transfer without intrusion and then detected an analogy coefficient of 0.692.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%