“…Only 𝜃 = 180° had non-zero heat transfer coefficients at a mass flux of 10 kg/m 2 s. 𝜃 = 0° had non-zero heat transfer coefficients at a heat flux of 4.3 kW/m 2 and 7.4 kW/m 2 but they were within the measurement error. 𝜃 = 0° and 180° both had non-zero heat transfer coefficient improvements at a mass flux of 20 kg/m 2 s. At the highest mass flux tested (40 kg/m 2 s), 𝜃 = 0°, 30°, 60° and 180° had non-zero heat transfer coefficient improvements.At a mass flux of 10 kg/m 2 s, the maximum heat transfer coefficient improvement was up to 35% in the twophase region at a rotation of 𝜃 = 180°, which is in agreement with the work of Li et al[27]. This improvement was up to 250% higher than the maximum improvement of 8% and 10% at a mass flux of 20 kg/m 2 s and 40 kg/m 2 s.All heat transfer coefficient improvements at a heat flux greater than 4.4 kW/m 2 in the two-phase region of 𝜃 = 180° was more than the maximum heat transfer coefficient improvements at a mass flux of 20 kg/m 2 s and 40 kg/m 2 s. It is expected this is because the effect of vapour on the heated wall at the 10 kg/m 2 s was more pronounced, allowing a greater improvement to be achieved.…”