2021
DOI: 10.1177/1097184x20981759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hegemony in Masculinity

Abstract: Most citations to “hegemonic masculinity” focus on gender ideals and men’s attempts to justify domination. Few scholars have tested the theory that masculinity can be hegemonic in effect by gaining the overt consent of others to their domination. We specify this largely untested theory and use data from a pilot study of middle-age men for our demonstration of how to operationalize and recognize hegemony. We argue that scholars will find that effect at intersections of gender and other inequalities such as age.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Aryans maintained their dominance by capitalizing on their majority position, having the support of site moderators, citing their long-time commitment to white nationalism, and employing discursive strategies aimed at invalidating alt-misogynistic masculinity. While King et al (2021) argue that older men seem to consent to their declining masculine status, I found these older users fought to maintain dominance over younger members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, Aryans maintained their dominance by capitalizing on their majority position, having the support of site moderators, citing their long-time commitment to white nationalism, and employing discursive strategies aimed at invalidating alt-misogynistic masculinity. While King et al (2021) argue that older men seem to consent to their declining masculine status, I found these older users fought to maintain dominance over younger members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…While men not fitting the locally hegemonic forms of masculinity, such as younger men or men with a higher socioeconomic status, were permitted to join the groups, their participation was accepted only if they acted in accordance with group norms, concealed their dissimilarity and subscribed to the shared narratives. As King, Calasanti, Pietilä, and Ojala (2021) have recently suggested, an essential mechanism of hegemonic masculinity is that subordinated or marginalized men consent to their subordinated status. As a result, a local hegemony of subordinated masculinities turns the dynamics of societal power relations upside down; here, parts of advantaged masculinities become assimilated into locally hegemonic but societally subordinated masculinities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, we refer to King et al . (in press), who suggest that the study of masculinity has much to gain from a focus on the intersectionality of gender and age. By listening to the fears (and experiences) of those who are ageing, we advance the research on masculinity as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%