The hero fallacy paradox: Cognitive dissonance and the rationalization of political violence

Abstract

This research explores the theoretical underpinnings of the expressed hero narrative utilized by groups and individuals to justify their opposition and use of violence against their own government and citizens. By using narrative analysis, this research deconstructs the language used by the groups and individuals involved in the 6 January 2021, attack on the United States Capitol. What emerges is a theory of self-radicalization and rationalization where one believes their actions are justified because they perceive themselves to be the hero. Their belief and ideology are built on a foundation of cognitive dissonance, in which they construct a paradoxical hero identity, all while engaged in destructive political violence.

Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections

“…Perceived problems with elections might also adversely affect democratic satisfaction ( Norris 2019 ). The 2020 U.S. presidential election has also shown that these same perceptions of unfairness and injustice could lead to outright violence ( Kydd 2021 ; Piazza 2022 ; Pope 2022 ).…”