The heterogeneous effects of COVID-19 on labor market flows: evidence from administrative data

Abstract

We investigate the short-term effects of COVID-19 on labor market flows and how they are mediated by labor market policy. Using Italian administrative data on a sample of active contracts between 2009 and the second quarter of 2020, we show that, before the pandemic, a higher share of female compared to male, young compared to old and low educated compared to high educated workers is employed in non-essential activities. When we look at the change in hirings and separations, from the 9th week of 2020 - the time when first cases and deaths due to COVID-19 were recorded -, we find a pronounced drop in hirings and endings of fixed-term contracts. Layoffs and quits increase after the 9th week, and then decline significantly, reflecting the effects of government intervention. The lifting of the lockdown triggers a slow recovery of labor market flows. Young workers, those on temporary contracts, low-educated workers, those employed in the South and those with no opportunities of working from home experience a greater decline in separation probability, indicating that government policy partly protected them from the labor market impact of the recession. The decline in the separation probability for women is lower than that for men. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10888-021-09522-610.1007/s10888-021-09522-6.

Relationship quality and support for family policy during the COVID‐19 pandemic

“…This is concerning, because if more privileged groups weather the COVID‐19 storm comparatively unscathed while the disadvantaged fall further behind, the gap between rich and poor may increase, with concomitant psychosocial, economic, demographic, and educational consequences. Given the United States was already facing historical levels of societal inequality prior to the crisis, the importance of public policy in addressing the issue is hard to understate, especially if, as research suggests, workers suffering from the consequences of the 2008/2009 recession are more likely to face some of the worst consequences (e.g., job loss) of the COVID‐19 recession (Casarico & Lattanzio, 2020 ).…”

Young people between education and the labour market during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy

“…6. Sectors identified as essential, which could continue operating, included mainly agriculture, some manufacturing, energy and water supply, transports and logistics, ICT, banking and insurance, professional and scientific activities, public administration, education, healthcare and some service activities. Non-essential sectors which were completely shut include most manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, hotels, restaurants and bars, entertainment and sport activities Casarico and Lattanzio (2020).…”

Policy Mix During a Pandemic Crisis: A Review of the Debate on Monetary and Fiscal Responses and the Legacy for the Future

“…People with temporary employment contracts, in general with low education levels, or those employed in sectors interested by lockdown measures clearly suffered higher-than average consequences (e.g. Bitler et al 2020, Blundell et al 2020, Casarico and Lattanzio 2020, Rondinelli and Zanichelli 2020, Carta and De Philippis, 2021. The pre-existing safety net is not always and not everywhere adequate to cope with this new environment.…”