Children's imaginative play about violent themes has long been contentious within educational policy, parenting literature, and the academe in the Anglophone world, with conflicting views as to its immediate and long term consequences. Scholarship in this field points, on the one hand, to concerns that such ludic activity is limited by media scripts (Levin and Carlsson-Paige 2006) and related to non-play aggression (Dunn and Hughes 2001). In contrast, another group of studies have found no clear correlations (e.g. Parsons and Howe 2006) and indicate there are numerous methodological limitations to research which infers a causal link between violently-themed play and aggression (Goldstein 1995). Others have argued that play with violent themes can be cathartic (Singer 1994), as well as support the growth of imagination and social relationships (Holland 2003), ethical identities (Edmiston 2008), physical skills (Pellegrini 2006), and literacy (Dyson 1997). Amongst educators, violently-themed play is similarly the subject of intense debate, often preoccupied with whether it should be allowed or prohibited in early childhood settings (Holland 2003). Perspectives in this debate are, at least in part, influenced by the social positions of observers. Connor's (1989) research suggests that distinctions made between play fighting and actual aggression depends in part on gender, childhood experiences with violently-themed play, and profession; with early childhood educators more likely to attribute actual aggression to play scenarios. Despite growing awareness of the impact adult views about childhood have on research and practice more generally (Dahlberg et al. 2007), only limited attention has been given to the way debates about children's violently-themed play are informed by adult imaginaries of childhood. Imaginaries are those commonly-held systems of values and meanings about who is a child; the competencies and characteristics association with those considered to be children; and ideas about the 'proper' activities and knowledge associated with childhood. The notion of imaginary is important in that it calls attention to the historical constitution of meanings at the cognitive level but also at the emotional and symbolic, such as the stories and images through which such ideas are carried. In considering why violently-themed play is often discouraged in preschool settings, Sutton-Smith (1997) is a notable exception in his attention to imaginaries of childhood. He argues that this is often the result of adult views that their role is to bring rationality to childhood and because of concerns that children are often "in charge" in such play, a reversal of taken-for-granted power relations.