1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02665761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hg-Cd-Zn-Te phase diagram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that determinations for DH o f ;298 ðIÞ by metal Section I: Basic and Applied Research solution calorimetry [30][31][32] are À101000 AE 418; À101000 AE 836; and À 99997 AE 1255 ðJ/molÞ. The Gibbs energy of formation obtained here is in good agreement with the experimental values and with values used earlier by ourselves [5,6] and by Jianrong et al [4] However, that from Yamaguchi et al [30] is about 12 kJ/mol more negative since their measured value for DH o f ;298 ðIÞ is about 12 kJ/mol more negative than all the other published values. The fact that they do not fit the measured Gibbs energy of formation would seem to indicate an error in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that determinations for DH o f ;298 ðIÞ by metal Section I: Basic and Applied Research solution calorimetry [30][31][32] are À101000 AE 418; À101000 AE 836; and À 99997 AE 1255 ðJ/molÞ. The Gibbs energy of formation obtained here is in good agreement with the experimental values and with values used earlier by ourselves [5,6] and by Jianrong et al [4] However, that from Yamaguchi et al [30] is about 12 kJ/mol more negative since their measured value for DH o f ;298 ðIÞ is about 12 kJ/mol more negative than all the other published values. The fact that they do not fit the measured Gibbs energy of formation would seem to indicate an error in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The heat capacities given by Pavlova, by Yamaguchi, and in our study [6] of the Cd-Te system are all 50 AE 0:5 J/mol K at 298 K. However, they differ significantly at the 1365 K melting point where they are, respectively, 58.7, 62.0, and 70. We also note that the heat contents calculated with the heat capacity given by Yamaguchi et al are larger than those calculated with that given by Pavlova et al, but by <1 J/mol between 298 and 800 K and by only 1 kJ/mol at 1365 K.…”
Section: Third Law Analysissupporting
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be pointed out that the standard entropy of ZnTe, derived from our measurements, is somewhat lower than the 83.39 J K --1 mol --1 calculated by Yu and Brebrick [5] from the [2,3] data and a C p = AT 3 extrapolation below 15 K.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%