2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The high-energy environment and atmospheric escape of the mini-Neptune K2-18 b

Abstract: K2-18 b is a transiting mini-Neptune that orbits a nearby (38 pc), cool M3 dwarf and is located inside its region of temperate irradiation. We report on the search for hydrogen escape from the atmosphere K2-18 b using Lyman-α transit spectroscopy with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) instrument installed on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We analyzed the timeseries of fluxes of the stellar Lyman-α emission of K2-18 in both its blue-and redshifted wings. We found that the average blueshifted em… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent analysis of HST/WFC3 transit observations revealed an absorption at 1.4 µm, which is interpreted as water vapour absorption (Tsiaras et al 2019;Benneke et al 2019b) or methane absorption (Bézard et al 2020) in a low-molecular-weight (H 2 /Hedominated) atmosphere. Recent observations by HST/STIS also confirm the interpretation that K2-18b has a H2-dominated atmosphere (dos Santos et al 2020). Benneke et al (2019b) also suggested that water clouds (most likely icy, but possibly liquid for a Bond albedo around 0.3) may form in the atmosphere of K2-18b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A recent analysis of HST/WFC3 transit observations revealed an absorption at 1.4 µm, which is interpreted as water vapour absorption (Tsiaras et al 2019;Benneke et al 2019b) or methane absorption (Bézard et al 2020) in a low-molecular-weight (H 2 /Hedominated) atmosphere. Recent observations by HST/STIS also confirm the interpretation that K2-18b has a H2-dominated atmosphere (dos Santos et al 2020). Benneke et al (2019b) also suggested that water clouds (most likely icy, but possibly liquid for a Bond albedo around 0.3) may form in the atmosphere of K2-18b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Unfortunately, no clear detections of the upper atmospheres of super‐Earths have been made so far. The most promising result is the tentative detection of neutral hydrogen for K2‐18b based on a partial transit observed with Hubble (dos Santos et al., 2020). This is consistent with the observation of the bulk atmosphere described above, but more data are needed to confirm the result.…”
Section: A Decade Of Super‐earth Atmosphere Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the attempts to directly observe the bulk atmospheres of sub-Neptune size planets, there have also been clever attempts to deduce the composition of these planets' atmospheres through observations of their thermospheres, exospheres, and winds. These observations have been obtained for neutral hydrogen at Lyman α (Bourrier et al, 2017;dos Santos et al, 2020;Ehrenreich et al, 2012;García Muñoz et al, 2020;Waalkes et al, 2019) and in the helium IR triplet (Kasper et al, 2020). The detection of neutral hydrogen in an escaping wind would constrain the mass-loss rate of the atmosphere but would have an ambiguous interpretation with regards to the composition because neutral hydrogen could be produced from the photodissociation of H 2 and H 2 O.…”
Section: A Decade Of Super-earth Atmosphere Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass loss can in turn leave substantial imprints on observed planetary statistics, such as the dearth of planets between 1.5 and 2 Earth radii (the "radius gap" or "evaporation valley") and the so-called "Neptune desert" in the radius-period plane (Lopez & Fortney 2013;Owen & Wu 2013Fulton et al 2017;Fulton & Petigura 2018;van Eylen et al 2018;Cloutier & Menou 2020;Hardegree-Ullman et al 2020). Over the past two decades, most measurements of mass-loss rates for close-in planets have been conducted at ultraviolet wavelengths, with Lyα detections for HD 209458b (Vidal-Madjar et al 2003), HD 189733b (Lecavelier Des Etangs et al 2010;Lecavelier des Etangs et al 2012), GJ 436b (Kulow et al 2014;Ehrenreich et al 2015;Lavie et al 2017), and GJ 3470b (Bourrier et al 2018); tentative/marginal signals for TRAPPIST-1b and c (Bourrier et al 2017a), Kepler-444e and f (Bourrier et al 2017b), and K2-18b (dos Santos et al 2020); and nondetections for 55 Cnc e (Ehrenreich et al 2012), HD 97658b (Bourrier et al 2017c), GJ 1132 b (Waalkes et al 2019), and π Men c (García Muñoz et al 2020). While in theory the large cross section of this line should result in strong absorption during exoplanet transits, in practice geocoronal emission and interstellar absorption effectively mask out the line core for most stars, requiring these studies to study the absorption in the line's extended wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%