research papers 422 Dennis et al. AhrC Acta Cryst. (2002). D58, 421±430 pseudo-palindromic ARG boxes which are the binding sites for the E. coli arginine repressor ArgR (ArgREc; Glansdorff, 1987; Smith et al., 1989). Examination of the argC promoter and gene using DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting revealed two AhrC-binding sites, which were named argC 01 and argC 02. The higher af®nity binding site, argC 01 , contains two ARG boxes separated by 11 bp and lies within the argC promoter, whilst the lower af®nity site, argC 02 , contains a single ARG box and is located within the argC structural gene (Czaplewski et al., 1992). The argG promoter contains two ARG boxes, separated by 2 bp, upstream of the transcription start site (Miller, 1997). The B. subtilis arginine catabolic pathway contains six enzymes encoded by genes within the two clusters rocABC and rocDEF. AhrC has been shown to interact in an l-arginine-dependent manner with operators within the promoter regions of rocA and rocD. Each of these operators consists of a single ARG box which is located directly adjacent to the transcription start site (Calogero et al., 1994; Klingel et al., 1995; Gardan et al., 1995; Miller et al., 1997). The af®nity of AhrC for the catabolic operators is 10-to 20-fold less than for the biosynthetic gene promoters (Miller et al., 1997), a ®nding consistent with the notion of cooperative binding of AhrC to the tandem repeats of ARG boxes within the upstream regulatory regions of argC and argG. The mechanism by which AhrC activates transcription from rocA and rocD remains unclear, although AhrC binding has been shown to increase the natural bend of the rocA promoter (Miller et al., 1997), which may facilitate interactions with RNA polymerase. Arginine-regulatory proteins, which are usually called ArgR in organisms other than B. subtilis, have been identi®ed in E. coli (Lim et al., 1987), B. stearothermophilus (Dion et al., 1997) and Salmonella typhimurium (Lu et al., 1992). These proteins have been biochemically characterized and shown to act as repressors of arginine biosynthesis in their respective hosts, although any roles in the activation of arginine catabolism remain to be con®rmed experimentally. Sequences are also known for probable AhrC/ArgR homologues from Clostridium perfringens (Ohtani et al., 1997), Haemophilus in¯uenzae (Fleischmann et al., 1995), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Cole et al., 1998), Streptomyces clavuligerus (Rodriguez-Garcia et al., 1997) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Priebe et al., 1988). The best characterized of the AhrC homologues is ArgR of E. coli (ArgREc; Lim et al., 1987; Maas, 1994). AhrC and ArgREc share 27% identity (North et al., 1989) and can crossfunction to some extent in vivo. AhrC can repress E. coli arginine genes and complement for ArgR as an essential accessory protein in the resolution of plasmid ColE1 multimers (Stirling et al., 1988); however, ArgR cannot repress the B. subtilis argC promoter (Smith et al., 1989). AhrC and ArgR both require the binding of l-arginine for hig...