2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The homotopy types of the posets of p-subgroups of a finite group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to show that in general every p-radical subgroup of G is equal to the intersection of the Sylow p-subgroups containing it, so B p (G) ⊆ i(S p (G)). For the other inclusion take Q ∈ i(S p (G)) and note that Syl However, it does not imply that A p (G) is contractible (see [MP18]). Hence, the previous proposition does not work for A p (G) ′ /G.…”
Section: Contractibility Of a P (G) ′ /Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is easy to show that in general every p-radical subgroup of G is equal to the intersection of the Sylow p-subgroups containing it, so B p (G) ⊆ i(S p (G)). For the other inclusion take Q ∈ i(S p (G)) and note that Syl However, it does not imply that A p (G) is contractible (see [MP18]). Hence, the previous proposition does not work for A p (G) ′ /G.…”
Section: Contractibility Of a P (G) ′ /Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stong's approach of [Sto84]. Stong showed that A p (G) and S p (G) have, in general, different homotopy types viewed as finite topological spaces (see also [MP18]), although their associated simplicial complexes K(A p (G)) and K(S p (G)) are always G-homotopy equivalent (see [Qui78,TW91]). In this context, Quillen's conjecture is equivalent to saying that if S p (G) is a homotopically trivial finite space then it is contractible as finite space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the homology groups and the fundamental group of the posets are those of their associated complexes. Note that this is not the convention that we adopted in our previous articles [23, 24]. In those papers, we handled the posets of p‐subgroups as finite topological spaces, with an intrinsic topology, where the notion of homotopy equivalence is strictly stronger than in the context of simplicial complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, condition 1 is a generalisation to every prime of the analogous result [5,Proposition 1.6] stated for > 5, and in our proof we use the classification of simple groups to a much lesser extent. Condition 2 of the theorem is based on our previous work on the fundamental group [11]. The more technical hypotheses of conditions 3 and 4 are focussed on extending [5,Main Theorem] to every odd prime .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%