2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01961.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The host-infecting fungal transcriptome

Abstract: The capture of pathogen gene expression signatures directly from the host niche promises to fuel our understanding of the highly complex nature of microbial virulence. However, obtaining and interpreting biological information from infected tissues presents multiple experimental and intellectual challenges, from difficulties in extracting pathogen RNA and appropriate choice of experimental design, to interpretation of the resulting infection transcriptome, itself a product of responses to multiple host-derived… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, clustering of these genes at subtelomeric loci may be a strategy for coordinated regulation of virulence gene expression. Movement of these clusters into subtelomeric regions would place them under the regulatory control of LaeA, a factor that regulates gene expression through chromatin remodeling (9). Microarray data support the idea that clustering facilitates the coordinated epigenetic regulation of virulence gene expression, as ϳ30% of clustered genes are induced during initiation of invasive aspergillosis in a mouse infection model (38).…”
Section: Evolution Of Virulence-associated Genes In Pathogenic Fungimentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Alternatively, clustering of these genes at subtelomeric loci may be a strategy for coordinated regulation of virulence gene expression. Movement of these clusters into subtelomeric regions would place them under the regulatory control of LaeA, a factor that regulates gene expression through chromatin remodeling (9). Microarray data support the idea that clustering facilitates the coordinated epigenetic regulation of virulence gene expression, as ϳ30% of clustered genes are induced during initiation of invasive aspergillosis in a mouse infection model (38).…”
Section: Evolution Of Virulence-associated Genes In Pathogenic Fungimentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These niches differ with respect to the types and concentrations of available carbon and nitrogen sources, and with regard to micronutrient levels. Fungal pathogens respond by tuning their nutrient acquisition and assimilation mechanisms accordingly (Steen et al 2003;Lorenz et al 2004;Fan et al 2005;Fradin et al 2005;Kaur et al 2007;Thewes et al 2007;Zakikhany et al 2007;McDonagh et al 2008;Walker et al 2009;Wilson et al 2009;Cairns et al 2010;Staib et al 2010;Cheng et al 2013). In some instances, the host actively reduces the availability of essential nutrients in an attempt to limit fungal colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, transcriptional profiling studies using microarrays or serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in ex vivo or in vivo infection models have provided insights into the nitrogen metabolism of pathogenic fungi such as C. albicans (Fradin et al 2005;Thewes et al 2007;Zakikhany et al 2007;Walker et al 2009;Wilson et al 2009;Cheng et al 2013), C. glabrata (Kaur et al 2007), A. fumigatus (McDonagh et al 2008), C. neoformans (Fan et al 2005;Steen et al 2003), and dermatophytes (Staib et al 2010) during infection (reviewed by Cairns et al 2010). …”
Section: Nitrogen Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in those studies, the authors compared fungal growth in vivo (during infection) vs. in vitro (on culture media) [21,22]. Therefore, the interpretation of these results and the subsequent conclusions have to be taken with caution, since transcriptomic studies depend on the experimental design, the time points studied and the type of reference sample used [28]. Our study was designed so that the first day of infection was used as reference, this was to avoid comparisons with in vitro conditions which may have led to differences connected to the culture conditions but not to the infectious process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%