2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hot (Invisible?) Hand: Can Time Sequence Patterns of Success/Failure in Sports Be Modeled as Repeated Random Independent Trials?

Abstract: The long lasting debate initiated by Gilovich, Vallone and Tversky in is revisited: does a “hot hand” phenomenon exist in sports? Hereby we come back to one of the cases analyzed by the original study, but with a much larger data set: all free throws taken during five regular seasons () of the National Basketball Association (NBA). Evidence supporting the existence of the “hot hand” phenomenon is provided. However, while statistical traces of this phenomenon are observed in the data, an open question still re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
67
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the causal interpretation one might be tempted to draw from earlier research (i.e., because there is an average increase in grades for answer changes, it is profitable for me to change my answers when in doubt) is incorrect. A similar finding was reported by Wardrop (1995), who showed that the “hot hand” in basketball—the alleged phenomenon that sequential successful free throws increase the probability of subsequent throws being successful—disappears when taking into account varying proportions of overall success—i.e., differences in individual ability (see also Yaari and Eisenmann, 2011). Within players over time, the success of a throw depended on previous successes in different ways for different players, although the hot-hand pattern (increased success rate after a hit) did appear at the level of aggregated data.…”
Section: Simpson's Paradox In Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the causal interpretation one might be tempted to draw from earlier research (i.e., because there is an average increase in grades for answer changes, it is profitable for me to change my answers when in doubt) is incorrect. A similar finding was reported by Wardrop (1995), who showed that the “hot hand” in basketball—the alleged phenomenon that sequential successful free throws increase the probability of subsequent throws being successful—disappears when taking into account varying proportions of overall success—i.e., differences in individual ability (see also Yaari and Eisenmann, 2011). Within players over time, the success of a throw depended on previous successes in different ways for different players, although the hot-hand pattern (increased success rate after a hit) did appear at the level of aggregated data.…”
Section: Simpson's Paradox In Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may surprise some categories (eg, tpse) have not appeared in the sequence of occurrences but must be taken into account that the timing of actual releases set to be random, always from the temporal approach on which rests the analysis tool heme (Magnusson, 2000;2005;2006). You might think that performing countries could increase the efectiveness of releases (Yaari & Eisenmann, 2011;Fernández., et al, 2009) however, it was not for any of the teams. Both teams were identiied making passes with efective and inefective releases, which could be interpreted as a search by the teams to get clear of rivals spaces, although releases not turn out always efective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failing to pay attention to this relational capacity with peers, would reduce the analysis of success in basketball (Courel, Suárez, Ortega, Piñar, & Cár-denas, 2013; Erčulj & Štrumbelj, 2015) to random factors in a particular motor situation. Although throw efectiveness (Fernández, Camerino, Anguera, & Jonsson, 2009;Yaari & Eisenmann, 2011) is an essential indicator to explain the outcome of a basketball game, even though this would not explain by itself how teams play, it does downplay the importance of having more ball possessions, since teams with few but efective possessions could prove themselves superior to opponents who do not have high percentages of efectiveness (Ibáñez, Feu, & Dorado, 2003 (Fernández., et al, 2009) or playing action (Garzón, Lapresa, Anguera, & Arana, 2011) was analyzed according to this methodology, to try to reveal regularities which took place during the games, but were hidden from an apparent look. Some analysis traditionally used by the well-established observational methodology (Anguera & Hernández-Mendo, 2014; Anguera & Hernández-Mendo, 2016) applied analysis which did not include the time dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to note that the persistent long-range memory present in the diffusive process can be related the "hot hand" phenomenon in sports. Since the seminal work of Gilovich et al [20] there has been a historical debate on whether "success breeds success" or "failure breeds failure" in the scoring process of many sports [21,22]. Here, the long-range persistent behavior in the score evolution not only indicates the existence of this phenomenon in cricket, but also suggests that this phenomenon can act over a very long temporal scale.…”
Section: S(t)−⟨s(t)⟩ σ(T)mentioning
confidence: 97%