The Human Touch: Using a Webcam to Autonomously Monitor Compliance During Visual Field Assessments

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of using various easy-to-obtain biomarkers to monitor non-compliance (measurement error) during visual field assessments. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults (42 eyes) and seven glaucoma patients (14 eyes) underwent two same-day visual field assessments. An ordinary webcam was used to compute seven potential biomarkers of task compliance, based primarily on eye gaze, head pose, and facial expression. We quantified the association between each biomarker and measurement error, as defined by (1) test-retest differences in overall test scores (mean sensitivity), and (2) failures to respond to visible stimuli on individual trials (stimuli −3 dB or more brighter than threshold). Results: In healthy eyes, three of the seven biomarkers were significantly associated with overall (test-retest) measurement error (P = 0.003-0.007), and at least two others exhibited possible trends (P = 0.052-0.060). The weighted linear sum of all seven biomarkers was associated with overall measurement error, in both healthy eyes (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and patients (r = 0.65, P < 0.001). Five biomarkers were each associated with failures to respond to visible stimuli on individual trials (all P < 0.001). Conclusions: Inexpensive, autonomous measures of task compliance are associated with measurement error in visual field assessments, in terms of both the overall reliability of a test and failures to respond on particular trials ("lapses"). This could be helpful for identifying low-quality assessments and for improving assessment techniques (e.g., by discounting suspect responses or by automatically triggering comfort breaks or encouragement). Translational Relevance: This study explores a potential way of improving the reliability of visual field assessments, a crucial but notoriously unreliable clinical measure.

Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences

“…Our investigation of this technology in a large group of people, although with healthy vision, is the subject of a report published elsewhere. 30 More generally, the fact that there were mixed opinions regarding the Eyecatcher interface (ie, with some finding the removal of the bowl liberating, while others expressed concerns regarding increased distractions) highlights the inherent complexities associated with developing and implementing novel health-related technologies and ensuring they match the needs and preferences of the target users. We hope that the in-depth feedback generated in this study will serve as a useful reference for clinicians, researchers and commissioners working in the area of VF home monitoring.…”

Development of the spatial contrast sensitivity function (CSF) during childhood: Analysis of previous findings and new psychophysical data

“…One possibility is that the developmental effect is an artifact of further nonvisual factors not already captured in our present data (i.e. random measurement error in the quantification of lapse rates, or transient lapses in concentration not detectable by our gross lapse rate metric (Jones, 2018;Jones et al, 2020)). For example, it might be that some children younger than approximately 12 years were more liable to become tired or distracted, or required more practice than adults to fully master the task.…”

Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months

“…During home-testing, the tablet-computer’s forward-facing camera recorded the participant. This allowed us to confirm the correct eye was tested, to record variations in ambient illumination, and to investigate whether ‘affective computing’ techniques (e.g., head-pose tracking and facial-expression analysis to recognize human emotions) could identify suspect tests 40 .…”