2020
DOI: 10.26226/morressier.5e4fe9be6bc493207536f68e
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The HyMethShip Concept: An investigation of system design choices and vessel operation characteristics influence on life cycle performance

Abstract: One potential method to decarbonize the maritime transport sector is by using onboard carbon capture technologies. One such potential future propulsion system is the "HyMethShip -Hydrogen-Methanol Ship propulsion system using onboard pre-combustion carbon capture" concept. In this study we use life cycle assessment to analyse the impact of system design choices on the overall environmental performance of the system. Using the HyMethShip on a vessel is shown to lower climate impact compared to today's conventio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…program declared that the closing CO 2 loop concept is technically available and economically feasible (Malmgren et al, 2020), the assumption of no on board EGCS and CCS was made in this paper because simplified systems and operations on board would mean fewer equipment failures, fewer human errors, less on board investment and operational costs, increased ship safety, increased payload, and more straightforward integration in terms of ship autonomy considering the trend towards autonomous vessels. Based on the above assumptions, fossil fuels including mineral oils, NG and coal could not be used on board directly.…”
Section: Well-to-wake Analysis For Zero Carbon or Carbon-neutral Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…program declared that the closing CO 2 loop concept is technically available and economically feasible (Malmgren et al, 2020), the assumption of no on board EGCS and CCS was made in this paper because simplified systems and operations on board would mean fewer equipment failures, fewer human errors, less on board investment and operational costs, increased ship safety, increased payload, and more straightforward integration in terms of ship autonomy considering the trend towards autonomous vessels. Based on the above assumptions, fossil fuels including mineral oils, NG and coal could not be used on board directly.…”
Section: Well-to-wake Analysis For Zero Carbon or Carbon-neutral Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost effectiveness of the system will also be assessed for different ship types and operational patterns using life cycle assessment. A preliminary assessment of environmental and economic impact of various design choices within HyMethShip can be found in [11].…”
Section: Hymethship Concept and Project Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of near-zero greenhouse gas emissions comes at the cost of increased system complexity. Any future regulation putting a price on carbon dioxide will directly impact the life cycle cost comparison with conventional propulsion systems [11] and therefore the economic viability of HyMethShip.…”
Section: Rules and Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, renewable fuel use in maritime applications has been the subject of many publications. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] In many of these assessments, the vessel's operational profile was unknown, and the engine's rated power was chosen at the beginning of the assessment. Several tools, including the Large Engines Competence Center (LEC) ENERsim 21 and ABS SIM, provide simulation-based optimization of shipping energy systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%