2014
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2014-0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The p-parity conjecture for elliptic curves with a p-isogeny

Abstract: For an elliptic curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains to prove the equivalence of (1), (2) and (3). Now Ω = Ω if and only if ord p ( Ω Ω ) is even, and we can relate this to the parity of the analytic rank and of the p ∞ -Selmer rank of E/Q: 3) or nonsplit multiplicative reduction (as ker φ ∼ = Z/pZ or μ p in the split multiplicative case, and it has no points after an unramified quadratic twist).…”
Section: Periods Of Elliptic Curves Over Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It remains to prove the equivalence of (1), (2) and (3). Now Ω = Ω if and only if ord p ( Ω Ω ) is even, and we can relate this to the parity of the analytic rank and of the p ∞ -Selmer rank of E/Q: 3) or nonsplit multiplicative reduction (as ker φ ∼ = Z/pZ or μ p in the split multiplicative case, and it has no points after an unramified quadratic twist).…”
Section: Periods Of Elliptic Curves Over Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.4]) and Cassels' formula for the parity of the p ∞ -Selmer rank for an elliptic curve with a p-isogeny([7, Rmk. is odd if and only if E has split multiplicative reduction at l. So the left-hand side in(2) is the number of primes of split multiplicative reduction. is odd if and only if E has split multiplicative reduction at l. So the left-hand side in(2) is the number of primes of split multiplicative reduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If T¯ is reducible, one applies a different argument based on a combination of an Euler characteristic formula for Breuil–Kisin modules (equipped with tame descent data) with a generalisation of a formula of Cassels [, Theorem 1.1]. This yields the following abstract result (see [, Theorem 2; , Theorem 5.7; , Theorem 1.4; , Theorem 2.1] for analogous results for Selmer groups of elliptic curves and abelian varieties, respectively). Theorem If, in the global situation discussed before Theorem (with p2), the following conditions are satisfied: (i)T¯ contains a ΓL‐stable Lagrangian subspace; (ii)for each finite prime vp of L there exist a finite abelian extension Lfalse(vfalse)/Lv and a finite Galois extension K(v)/L(v) such that p[K(v):L(v)] and Tfalse|normalΓK(v) is unramified; (iii)for each finite prime vp of L there exists a finite abelian extension Kfalse(vfalse)/Lv such that T|ΓKfalse(vfalse)=TπG for some p‐divisible group G (equipped with an scriptO‐action) over OK(v)<...>…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the number field case, this conjecture is now known in several cases, in particular when A is an elliptic curve and the ground field is K = Q by the work of the Dokchitser brothers [DD08, DD09, DD10, DD11], Kim [Kim07,Kim09], Nekovář [Nek13,Nek01,Nek09], [Nek06,Ch. 12],Česnavičius [Ces12], Coates et al [CFKS10] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%