The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines

Bilbro, Nicole; Hirst, Allison; Páez, Arsenio; Vasey, Baptiste; Pufulete, Maria; Sedrakyan, Art; McCulloch, Peter

doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004180

Cited by 83 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies assessing safety and feasibility of surgical telementoring in new areas of implementation should be in accordance with the IDEAL framework. 18 Adherence to the mentioned principles is crucial to further development of this novel educational tool.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The IDEAL framework provides five stages for development and evaluation and is recommended when introducing surgical innovations (i.e., surgical telementoring). 18 The IDEAL framework is of importance when the faculty is planning a surgical telementoring curriculum, and consists of the following stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long term study (IDEAL):…”

Section: Definitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Educational value of surgical telementoring

Butt

Augestad

2021

Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Educating surgeons is a time‐consuming process. In addition to theoretical knowledge, the practical tasks of surgical procedures must be mastered. Translation of such knowledge from mentor to mentee may be efficiently done by surgical telementoring (ST). This is a review on surgical telementoring. Recent technological advances have made this tool in surgical education more available and applicable but future applications of ST have to be wisely guided by high‐quality trials.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Definitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Educational value of surgical telementoring

Butt

Augestad

2021

Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A single-centre prospective proof of concept study design was adopted, as defined by the IDEAL guidelines for assessing innovation in surgery, and the relevant reporting guidelines were used in the preparation of this article. 13,14…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Intraoperative Ultrasound Probe for Transsphenoidal Surgery: First-in-human study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Ultrasound has been explored as an alternative, less bulky, less time-consuming and less expensive means of intraoperative imaging in pituitary surgery. However, its use has been limited by the size of its probes relative to the transsphenoidal corridor. We developed a novel prototype that is more slender than previously reported forward-viewing probes and, in this report, we assess its feasibility and safety in an initial patient cohort. Method. The probe was integrated into the transsphenoidal approach in patients with pituitary adenoma, following a single-centre prospective proof of concept study design, as defined by the Innovation, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-Term Study (IDEAL) guidelines for assessing innovation in surgery (IDEAL stage 1 – Idea phase). Results. The probe was employed in 5 cases, and its ability to be used alongside the standard surgical equipment was demonstrated in each case. No adverse events were encountered. The average surgical time was 20 minutes longer than that of 30 contemporaneous cases operated without intraoperative ultrasound. Conclusion. We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of our novel ultrasound probe during transsphenoidal procedures to the pituitary fossa, and, as a next step, plan to integrate the device into a surgical navigation system (IDEAL Stage 2a – Development phase).

show abstract

“…We will consider consensus to be reached and the potential predictive factors will be included if more than 70% of panel members score the statement within 7-9 (critical importance) or less than 15% of panel members score the statement within 1-3 (low importance); or in contrast, the potential predictive factors will be excluded if more than 70% of panel members score the statement within 1-3 (low importance) or less than 15% of panel members score the statement within 7-9 (critical importance). 32 This framework is recommended by the GRADE group used to assess the importance of evidence. At the end of the questionnaire, we will encourage experts who participate in the survey to add some other potential predictive factors that they think are relevant, and it is better to provide some reasons.…”

Section: Consensus Definition and Analysis Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We will consider consensus to be reached and the potential predictive factors will be included if more than 70% of panel members score the statement within 7–9 (critical importance) or less than 15% of panel members score the statement within 1–3 (low importance); or in contrast, the potential predictive factors will be excluded if more than 70% of panel members score the statement within 1–3 (low importance) or less than 15% of panel members score the statement within 7–9 (critical importance). 32 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors predicting successful vaginal birth after caesarean section: protocol for evidence-based consensus recommendations using a Delphi survey

Zhu

Feng

et al. 2021

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionWith the wide adoption of the two-child policy in China since 2016, a large percentage of women with a history of caesarean delivery plan to have a second child. Accordingly, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) delivery is increasing. Women attempting repeat VBAC may experience multiple morbidities, which is also one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal mortality. However, it remains to be addressed how we evaluate factors for successful VBAC. This study aims to use a novel approach to identify a set of potential predictive factors for successful VBAC, especially for Chinese women, to be included in prediction models which can be most applicable to pregnant women in China. We plan to assess all potential predictive factors collected through a comprehensive literature review. Then the certainty of the evidence for the identified potential predictive factors will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. Finally, a two-round international Delphi survey will be conducted to determine the level of consensus.Methods and analysisThis study will apply a methodology through an evidence-based approach. A long list of potential predictive factors for successful VBAC will be extracted and identified through the following stages: First, an up-to-date systematic review of the published literature will be conducted to extract identified potential predictive factors for successful VBAC. Second, an online Delphi survey will be performed to achieve expert consensus on which factors should be included in future prediction models. The online questionnaires will be developed in the field of patient, maternal and fetal-related factors. A two-round international Delphi survey will be distributed to the expert panel in the field of perinatal medicine using Google Forms. Experts will be asked to score each factor using the 9-point Likert rating scale to establish potential predictive factors for the successful VBAC. The expert panel will determine on whether to include, potentially include or exclude predictive factors, based on a systematic review of clinical evidence and the Delphi method.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Jiaxing Maternity and Children Healthcare Hospital (approval number: 2019–79). The results of this study will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals or conferences in perinatal medicine or obstetrics.

show abstract

The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines

Cited by 83 publications

References 22 publications

Educational value of surgical telementoring

Educational value of surgical telementoring

A Novel Intraoperative Ultrasound Probe for Transsphenoidal Surgery: First-in-human study

Factors predicting successful vaginal birth after caesarean section: protocol for evidence-based consensus recommendations using a Delphi survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About