Increasing evidence suggests that the numbers of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are more than those of protein-coding genes in various organisms. Although the detection methods for lncRNAs are being increasingly established, there are advantages and disadvantages that exist for each method. In this opinion article, I highlight the differences between microarrays and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) for the detection of lncRNAs. Compared to RNA-seq, microarrays are limited to the known sequences. However, the detection method as well as data analysis workflow is more established, which makes it easier to analyze the data for bench scientists without extensive knowledge about computer programming. In order to highlight the usage of microarrays over RNA-seq for the detection of lncRNAs, we are organizing a special issue for High-Throughput called "Microarrays in Non-Coding RNAs Profiling", which will include the specific usages of microarrays for lncRNAs.Keywords: long non-coding RNA; non-coding RNA; microarray; RNA-seq It is now firmly recognized that coding parts of protein-coding genes occupy a very minor part of the mammalian genome, although a vast majority of the mammalian genome is transcribed to RNA [1][2][3]. Currently, those RNAs that do not encode for proteins are collectively called "non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs)", which are further categorized by their lengths rather than their functionalities. Although the functions of small RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs), have been elucidated in the past two decades, potential functions of longer ncRNAs are understudied and just recently being investigated in various fields of study. Among longer ncRNAs, those longer than 200 nucleotides are classified as "long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs)", which were once considered "junk DNA" [4]. As technology advances, more and more lncRNAs are discovered and reported, although their functions remain mostly unknown. Although their functions are unknown, it is speculated that the number of lncRNAs increases as organisms move up in the evolutionary ladder [5]. Thus, understanding lncRNAs might shed light on the complexity of organisms during evolution [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Also, lncRNAs are involved in a variety of cellular processes [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and their dysregulations are linked to some diseases [21][22][23][24][25][26].To detect lncRNAs, there are two most common methods: microarrays and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) using next generation sequencers. The former is well-established method, which has a rather long history for the detection of protein-coding genes. Given that probes can be designed as long as sequences are known, it is not surprising that microarrays can be designed to detect lncRNAs. More importantly, the previously built microarrays contain probe sequences that match lncRNAs, although they were initially designed for protein-coding genes. This is due partially to the re-annotation of previously thought protein-coding genes as lncRNAs. Recently, we and others re-annotated the probe sequences of ...