2006
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4402-05.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Corticotectal Impulse on the Awake Superior Colliculus

Abstract: Corticotectal (CTect) neurons of layer 5 are large and prominent elements of mammalian visual cortex, with thick apical dendrites that ascend to layer 1, "intrinsically bursting" membrane properties, and fast-conducting descending axons that terminate in multiple subcortical domains. These neurons comprise a major output pathway of primary visual cortex, but virtually nothing is known about the synaptic influence of single CTect impulses on the superior colliculus (SC). Here, we examine the distribution of mon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps most consistently, we observed a characteristic CSD depth profile, with current sources and sinks, or net inward and outward transmembrane currents, reflecting the approximate location of the anatomical border between the two main superficial SC layers, the SGS and SO. A previous report in awake rabbits reported the location of the ID more superficially in the upper SGS (Bereshpolova et al 2006). However, the relative size of various SC layers, and the SGS in particular, is known to differ between species (Hilbig et al 2000).…”
Section: Visual Responses Display Laminar Specificitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Perhaps most consistently, we observed a characteristic CSD depth profile, with current sources and sinks, or net inward and outward transmembrane currents, reflecting the approximate location of the anatomical border between the two main superficial SC layers, the SGS and SO. A previous report in awake rabbits reported the location of the ID more superficially in the upper SGS (Bereshpolova et al 2006). However, the relative size of various SC layers, and the SGS in particular, is known to differ between species (Hilbig et al 2000).…”
Section: Visual Responses Display Laminar Specificitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1D, top arrow). (2) Following the onset of the axonal potential by Ͻ1 ms, a fast-rising negative-going potential (10 -90% rise time ϭ 0.47 ms for sustained, 0.43 for transient) occurs, reflecting a focal monosynaptic depolarization (Swadlow and Gusev, 2000;Bereshpolova et al, 2006) (Fig. 1D, bottom arrow).…”
Section: The Impact Of An Lgnd Impulse On the Visual Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we classified each LGNd neuron as sustained or transient using traditional receptive field analyses, and then we measured the dynamics of the synapses generated by each of these neurons using the method of spike-triggered current sourcedensity (CSD) analysis. This approach enables assessment of monosynaptic currents generated by impulses of single presynaptic afferents to the topographically aligned region of cortex Bereshpolova et al, 2006;Jin et al, 2008). We found that TC synapses of sustained and transient geniculocortical neurons generated monosynaptic currents that differed significantly in their dynamics and in their sublaminar organization within layer 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1 from Swadlow and Gusev 2000). The early waveform (i.e., the AxTP) reflects the incoming action potential, whereas the later negativity, termed the focal synaptic negativity (FSN), is a postsynaptic field response (Bereshpolova et al 2006;Swadlow and Gusev 2000). In experiments in which the array was used to record cortical activity, we obtained data from 45 thalamic units and 153 cortical recording sites, 109 of which yielded an AxTP.…”
Section: Spike-triggered Averagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spike-triggered-averaging approach assumes that the evoked activity in the cortex reflects the influence of the single thalamic neuron that is being recorded (Bereshpolova et al 2006;Swadlow and Gusev 2000). As noted by Swadlow and colleagues, in the case of AxTPs, the waveforms are so brief that they are unlikely to be produced by multiple cells, which would have to fire virtually simultaneously.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%